• towerful@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    WiFi has literally gone the opposite of USB.
    It used to be obvious what USB speeds were, whereas WiFi was 802.11b or whatever.
    Now we have WiFi 5 or WiFi 6. And we have USB-C PD 10gbps with AltMode

    • hyperhopper@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      USB has gotten more complicated and does way more now in more contexts. It charges laptops now, it carries multiplexed displayport signals, it does its own handshake and performs hardware level initialization protocols.

      Meanwhile we’ve been wanting the same thing out of wifi since the start. Nothing’s really changed, we just want it to go faster.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fair point.
        USB doing everything requires significantly more description of what a port can actually do.
        I just wish the USB foundation didn’t go with something that makes it difficult to find devices supporting specific features, and played directly into the marketing “upselling/shrinkflation” thing.
        The ubs3.1, usb3.2, gen1, gen2, 10gbps etc. It’s a LOT, and everything is very similar.

      • anlumo@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re thinking of USB-C, not the USB standard. USB PD, Alternative Mode and Thunderbolt aren’t part of the USB spec.

        • hyperhopper@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, I’m thinking about the port. Which is what we are talking about. Usb-c, usb-pd, thunderbolt, etc, all use the same port. I can use the same cable in the same port for all of these.