Businesses that rely on creatives should probably avoid angering them.

Businesses that rely on creatives should probably avoid angering them.

  • soulfirethewolf@lemdro.idEnglish
    423·
    10 months ago

    I feel like anymore, artists just look through companies work just to go point out AI art and whine about it

    • bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.netEnglish
      113·
      10 months ago

      If artists aren’t producing work and just complaining about AI art, who is AI stealing the work of?

      Your argument literally defeats itself.

      • Shurimal@kbin.social
        713·
        10 months ago

        No-one. Training a neural network, natural or artificial, is not “stealing”. Or no artist would be able to study the works of other artists to become a better artist themself.

        • bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.netEnglish
          112·
          10 months ago

          Your argument seems to be that we should consider the AI to itself be an artist and to grant it the rights of other artists.

          That’s fair.

          But other artists aren’t allowed to profit off reproducing other’s works.

          They also are compensated for their work.

          Is OpenAI putting money in a trust for when their product gains sentience?

          • 520@kbin.social
            81·
            10 months ago

            But other artists aren’t allowed to profit off reproducing other’s works.

            But we do allow them to take inspiration from other artists and emulate their styles.

            Much of the issue around AI art seems to be more about the prompter (IE: asking explicitly for copyrighted stuff or real people) than the AI itself.

    • foxbat@lemmings.worldEnglish
      3·
      10 months ago

      wacom is a company that produces drawing tablets. you know, hardware tools for artists. it is their job to market specifically to artists.