Taylor Swift is living every woman’s AI porn nightmare — Deepfake nudes of the pop star are appearing all over social media. We all saw this coming.::Deepfake nudes of the pop star are appearing all over social media. We all saw this coming.

  • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    So she’s less a victim because she’s wealthy? My god you people can justify anything, can’t you?

    • MJKee9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      You just keep shifting your argument to create some sort of sympathy. I guess. No one says a rich person isn’t a victim. The point is is being a victim as a wealthy and influential woman like Taylor is a lot different than being a victim in a working class context. If you disagree with that, then you’re either being intellectually dishonest or living in a dream world.

      Even the law agrees. It’s a lot harder as a celebrity to win a defamation lawsuit than it is being a normal person. You typically have to show actual malice. Frankly, that’s the legal standard that would probably apply to any lawsuit involving the deep fakes anyway.

          • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            So, creating nude AI deepfakes isn’t a crime? Then there’s no victims at all. What’s everyone talking about then?

            • MJKee9@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              It can’t be a crime unless there is a criminal statute that applies. See if you can find one thst applies.

                • MJKee9@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Your response doesn’t logically respond to my comment. It attempts to reframe the argument by setting up a “strawman,” and shows that you fail to understand (or choosing to ignore because it doesn’t support your new reframed argument) the difference between civil and criminal law in the United States.

    • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      That is exactly it. She will suffer less compared to someone else this might have happened to, an dif you define victimhood on a spectrum, she’s less victim than Housewife Community leader preschool teacher Margaret from Montana.

      • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Gross dude. Very gross. Blocking you now as someone who thinks the wealthy can’t be victimized can’t possibly have anything of value to contribute.

        Do better.