The only few reason I know so far is software availability, like adobe software, and Microsoft suite. Is there more of major reasons that I missed?

    • Footnote2669@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It really is, after reading whole threads about people shitting on Apple products for no good reason. Not criticism, but name calling etc

      • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Apple products are generally fine, its their ethos that sucks. Closed, expensive, proprietary.

        Its far too limiting IMO. Open MacOS and it would be quite a compelling option

        • tartan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          What specifically do you mean when you say “Open MacOS”? Open to what? You can already install anything you want on it. It’s unix based, so your terminal works mostly the same as in Linux. You’ve even got a package manager (homebrew), so you won’t miss apt or whatever else you use. iOS is another discussion, but imho, OSX is “open” enough.

          • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Alterable Desktop Environments, alternative stores, removing integrated packages such as the app store, installable on non Apple hardware, whether arm or x86.

            Open air drop as a standard would help too

            IMO even windows is too closed for my taste.

          • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The hardware is rarely ever comparable. You show me a like for like hardware comparison, and Mac will always be more expensive with fewer upgrade paths.

            • Footnote2669@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Well yeah, it’s probably more expensive, but hardware is not all you’re paying for though

              • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Which also goes to my oldness argument. Their software is locked, proprietary, and too ingrained Intl the System.