This episode of Security Now covered Google’s plan to deprecate third party cookies and the reaction from advertising organizations and websites.

The articles and the opinions of the show hosts are that it may have negative or unintended consequences as rather than relying on Google’s proposed ad selection scheme being run on the client side (hiding information from the advertiser), instead they are demanding first party information from the sites regarding their user’s identification.

The article predicts that rather than privacy increasing, a majority of websites may demand user registration so they can collect personal details and force user consent to provide that data to advertisers.

What’s your opinion of website advertising, privacy, and data collection?

  • Would you refuse to visit websites that force registration even if the account is free?
  • What’s all the fuss about, you don’t care?
  • Is advertising a necessary evil in fair trade for content?
  • Would this limit your visiting of websites to only a narrow few you are willing to trade personal details for?
  • Is this a bad thing for the internet experience as whole, or just another progression of technology?
  • Is this no different from using any other technology platform that’s free (If it’s free, you’re the product)?
  • Should website owners just accept a lower revenue model and adapt their business, rather than seeking higher / unfair revenues from privacy invasive practices of the past?
  • treefrog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Here’s an example.

    I was advertised camel smokes as a kid.

    Everytime I relapse it’s on camels. Camels are shitty and cheap.

    I relapse and then switch to a brand that’s not garbage. Then figure out again how to beat the addiction.

    It’s a substance use disorder directly caused by advertising. And cancer causing (so my physical environment).

    Here’s another mental illness that’s very easy to trace back to advertising.

    Eating disorders.

    • RedFox@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I think those are good examples, thanks.

      Off topic: I don’t smoke, but do generally hate smoking so much. I dislike the smell, and the affects on people around the user, like you said. I appreciate vaping. Not because of some hopeful idea that it would be safer, but cause I either can’t smell it, or it smells like cotton candy. Who doesn’t love the smell of cotton candy?

      Also, props for quitting all the times you have. I’m probably majorly addicted to caffeine. Like smokers tell me they have one first thing in the morning, coffee is the first desire after I’m out of bed. I’ve already limited myself to two-ish cups/day, but I don’t think that helped. Coffee also has negative effects on others…fortunately, my wife has coffee breath too :)

      • iquanyin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        just to say, it’s about 95% less full of harmful chemicals. even opponents admit that. vaping is safer. not safe but safer. and unlike the 200+ times i tried to quite over 45 years (hypnosis, gum, patch, groups, acupuncture, and a heap 'cold turkey), it took me just a few years to quit by first switching to vapes. and within a month of the switch, i felt better in every way. all the bs restrictions in place are so dumb.

        • RedFox@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m glad that helped. Was it the ability to dose down intentionally that helped?

        • treefrog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It’s also more addictive than tobacco. Which isn’t saying it’s not safer. But the vape ROA hits the brain faster than smoking. This reinforces the addiction cycle more effectively. One of the reasons crack cocaine is so fucking addictive. It’s vaped cocaine.

          • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            No the other way around. Smoking hits you very fast, almost instantly because it’s very fine particles that pass into the bloodstream. Vaping is much slower because it’s vaporized droplets that get absorbed slowly through mucus membrane, and it’s less effective (like 50% effective after 30 min vs. 100% after 5 min). Nicotine salt e-liquid “improves” that a bit to hit faster, to help people stop smoking. You can find articles and papers on this.

            • treefrog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Huh… I was basing this info off huberman labs episode on nicotine. He’s usually very accurate (he’s a neurobiologist and a professor at a major university)

      • treefrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I was referring to quality lol

        I can buy a pack of American Spirits and half a smoke will satisfy me.

        I finish a Camel, and I’m like, wtf happened to that thing?