Counties are blocking wind and solar across the US::Local governments across the U.S. are blocking new clean energy plants. See the best locations for wind and solar power, and where it’s being stopped.

  • greenskye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    8 months ago

    The inability to install solar panels on my home is enshrined in my HOA and is extremely unlikely to be overturned by our members. We should be passing laws making these types of restrictions illegal

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      8 months ago

      There’s a story on Reddit about someone who snuck an extension cable onto the HOA president’s property and had it running something like an air conditioner full blast nonstop for months. They later said something to the effect of “oh yes, prices are going up but my friend who lives in the other city has solar and he’s fine”. This apparently convinced the person to change the bylaws.

    • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Wait… Aren’t you guys supposed to be the free-est nation on earth or something?

      • crypticthree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        We’re a country founded by slave owners who wrote things like “all men are created equal”

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        HOAs were literally created to make sure that black people couldn’t buy homes. These covenants put legal blocks on the deed for eternity to keep it from happening. It didn’t take long for white people to buy a house and then turn around and sell it to a black family. The entire thing crashed. What we are left with are small Karens and Chads trying to control the people around them.

        • phillaholic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          Minorities in general. Some of the first HOAs excluded Blacks, Jews, Asians, etc in literal writing. It took a SCOTUS case to overturn.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          They also exist to make building a subdivision easier which is there primary purpose today.

          • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            You mistyped “allow municipalities to avoid their responsibilities and grant power to private shadow governments with storied histories of abuse and none of the hypothetical accountability that is guaranteed by the US Constitution”.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        They are free to die without healthcare

    • Ben Hur Horse Race@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 months ago

      what- the HOA folks are worried they’d see your PV panels instead of a shingled roof for the .4 seconds they see it at all while they’re parking in thier driveways?

    • Railison@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      Where I’m from, laws were changed so communities like this can’t block lot modifications that improve a lot’s sustainability performance (e.g. rooftop solar, rainwater harvesting, etc.). Not that anyone here would block rooftop solar, it’s wildly popular.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      I suspect that more states will follow WA and CA and start saying that counties and cities no longer can block things like denser housing, extra units on a lot, or solar.

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Find an HOA with conservative leadership and you’ll find all sorts of bs. Worse when they weren’t like that when you bought, but have turned into a MAGA idiot and reject anything green on principle.

    • privatizetwiddle@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes. And some states (e.g. Washington) already have.

      The governing documents may not prohibit the installation of a solar energy panel by an owner or resident on the owner’s or resident’s property […]

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I live in uber-blue NW Oregon and even my county banned solar farms because they claim it’s wasting our fertile soil that can be used for factory farming instead. The county is controlled by douchy Republicans though

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      49
      ·
      9 months ago

      Odds are that they are Republican counties because wind and solar tend to be built in rural areas and rural areas tend to be Republican. I would actually expect Democrat held areas to also oppose them because people in general are NIMBY.

      That said, there are a bunch of valid reasons to oppose large scale projects that can be addressed. A primary problem is the disruption to the local area, either by destroying roads not designed for the heavy machinery or the government taking land from locals that is necessary to implement the project. Both could be handled differently than they tend to be as the large companies that implement these projects tend to not care about locals already living in the area. Some ways they could improve the process would be to improve the roads and offer better compensation for affected locals, but there are valid reasons that some retired person who lives in the home they grew up in to oppose a power plant even if it would be a net benefit to society.

      That is to say it is complicated and the best that can be done is better treatment of the people that are impacted by these projects while understanding that some are just complaining to complain and some really do have valid complaints that need to be better addressed so progress can be made.

      • RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        70
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve lived in left leaning areas for decades. Solar is everywhere, from rooftops to open fields. We don’t have a ton of wind, but there’s a lot of offshore farms and quite a few in the hills. Nobody is “taking” land, it’s sold by the landowner.

        If right wing areas are blocking renewables it’s far more likely to be done so it props up the fossil fuel/power generation companies and has little or nothing to do with any actual drawbacks of renewables or their installation.

        • frostysauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Nobody is “taking” land, it’s sold by the landowner.

          If someone “owns” land that land was taken by somebody.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          27
          ·
          9 months ago

          Rural folks don’t care about other people having rooftop solar panels. I am also not talking about offshore farms, which should be clear by my example about someone’s house being impacted.

          Large scale wind and solar do require some legal action in rural areas to make them feasible. The most common is needing to run the extremely large power lines across fields to the centralized distribution centers.

          It needs to be done, and people will be impacted, but they are still people and shouldn’t be ignored completely. In general, they should probably be conpensated more than they are for the inconvenience of having land forcibly purchased from them, or for the negative impacts on their area that are unavoidable for such large scale projects.

      • psivchaz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I feel like we always do things exactly the opposite of whatever rational would be.

        “These people aren’t using the land to it’s full potential so we’re justified in murdering them and taking the land.” - About the people living half naked off the land.

        “You can’t just make people move, even if you compensate them and are doing it for the greater good.” - About the people who drive a pickup truck to Walmart.

        I know there’s more nuance, it’s just funny to me.

        • angrymouse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not OP but the thing about locals is serious, in Brazil I know about some wind farms that had disrupted the life of locals because was made too close of their houses, and these windmills are very loud. Now ppl can’t live a decent life there and energy companies gave compensation to them.

    • neumast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The planet itself will survive this easily, the inhabitants on the other hand…

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yep, this is what I tell people…the planet will recover just fine…but just after it’s killed pretty much everything off and started over.

    • puppy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nah the planet will be just fine. Humans (and other living things) though will truly be fucked.

      • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Some living things will make it through the extinction event and the next sentient species will fuck it all up again in a billion years or so.

        • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Assuming they can even get to our level, we already extracted the easily reachable fossil fuels and the circumstances that originally created them (lots of trees dying and not being broken down by fungi) probably won’t ever reoccur.

          Maybe something will turn all the plastic we’re making into a new fossil fuel, but more likely any civilization that comes after us will be stuck in the bronze/iron age.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Can’t the boomers are still around and they still remember when Jane Fonda was easy on the eyes. Plus you know you got the granola gluten free spiritual not religious types now who are convinced they can generate electricity from unicorn farts.

            • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I don’t think she shot at anyone, she was photographed sitting on an air defense gun in North Vietnam if that’s what you mean.

              And it’s true about the video profits, it’s all a matter of public record you can look it up if you’re so inclined.

                • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Read up on the Campaign for Economic Democracy it’s a really interesting bit of history. She’s been involved in activism her whole life - anti war, feminism, climate protection and economic justice causes, actually a really cool person (if you like left wing causes)

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Maybe some of these things (at least rooftop solar, but maybe not wind turbines) ought to be guaranteed by right on a Federal basis, kind of like how the FTC prevents local governments from stopping people from putting up antennas.

    • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      The biggest barrier to consumer renewable energy is price (and it has gone down considerably already.) Big projects ensures more development, which can lead to even lower prices.

      With the state of the US power grid, we need more big renewable projects everywhere. Better subsidies on home renewables to take stress off the grid. The sooner the better !

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      From the article it looks to be only “utility-scale” projects that are blocked, I assume that doesn’t include roof solar.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I know what they mean, but the headline makes it sound like they’re building a big-ass dome across the US, to block out the sun and wind entirely.

  • Shortbus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I live in SE NC. Duke energy has incentives for solar and they are about to pay for the installation of my Tesla charger in my garage… It’s not all bad I guess…