There are quite a few choices of brands when it comes to purchasing harddisks or ssd, but which one do you find the most reliable one? Personally had great experiences with SeaGate, but heard ChrisTitus had the opposite experience with them.

So curious to what manufacturers people here swear to and why? Which ones do you have the worst experience with?

    • BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      An analogy is writing everything on one piece of paper with a pencil. When you need to change or remove something, you cross it out, instead of erasing, and write the new data to a clean part of the paper. When there are no more clean areas, you use the eraser to erase a crossed off section.

      The larger the paper, the less frequent you come back to the same area again with the eraser.

      Using an eraser on paper slowly degrades the paper until that section tears and never gets used again.

    • BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      In general and simplifying, my understanding is:

      There is the area where data is written, and there is the File Allocation Table that keeps track of where files are placed.

      When part of a file needs to be overwritten (either because it inserted or there is new data) the data is really written to a new area and the old data is left as is. The File Allocation Table is updated to point to the new area.

      Eventually, as the disk gets used, that new area eventually comes back to a space that was previously written to, but is not being used. And that data gets physically overwritten.

      Each time a spot is physically overwritten, it very very slightly degrades.

      With a larger disk, it takes longer to come back to a spot that has already been written to.

      Oversimplifying, previously written data that is no longer part of a file is effectively lost, in the way that shredding a paper effectively loses whatever is written, and in a more secure way than as happens in a spinning disk.

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I thought you meant 1 TB as a sort of peak performer (better than 2+ TB) in this area. From the description, it’s more like 1 TB is kinda the minimum durability you want with a drive, but larger drives are better?

        • BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          From the drives I have seen, usually there are 3 write-cache sizes.

          Usually the smallest write-cache is for drives 128GB or smaller. Sometimes the 256GB is also here.

          Usually the middle size write-cache is for 512GB and sometimes 256GB drives.

          Usually the largest write-cache is only in 1TB and bigger drives.

          Performance-wise for writes, you want the biggest write cache, so you want at least a 1TB drive.

          For the best wear leveling, you want the drive as big as you can afford, while also looking at the makeup of the memory chips. In order of longest lasting listed first: Single Level, Multi Level, Triple Level, Quad Level.

          • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            This is great, thank you! My next drive is going to be fast and durable.