• loics2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    I really wanted to like tidal, but honestly it’s not really good. The search sucks, no offline mode on desktop, no official Linux client, an incomplete catalog…

    It’s not worth it, even if they are the least bad for paying artists.

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You can use Plexamp as a Tidal client. I do this for offline music. Works on desktop too 🙂

      • rbits@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Need a Plex server though :/

        Also cost $6.50AUD a month, way too much.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t think you need a Plex server to use the tidal feature.

          Btw Plexamp seems to be free (with a few restrictions) to everyone now and not just Plex pass subscribers (which admittedly was expensive if you only used Plexamp and didn’t have a life time sub like me)

          Source: https://www.plex.tv/plex-pass/

          • rbits@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            How do you set it up without a server. I can’t get past this screen

            Plexamp Select a Library screen

            Edit: Also on that web page is says that downloads are locked behind Plex Pass, that’s pretty vital…

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Good question. The website FAQ says that tidal can be used without a webserver but I have never tried it personally.

    • Pinecone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      The limited library was their biggest problem in my opinion. It’s acceptable if you want mainstream, well known artists centered on appealing to North America but there were so many international and independent groups that weren’t on the service. Higher quality streaming is only worth it if you can listen to what you like.

    • rbits@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah. The number one reason I won’t subscribe is that if their library is missing a song, you can’t even add it yourself. Both Spotify and Apple Music allow adding your own MP3s, how does Tidal not have that feature?!

    • jul@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      64
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      honestly it’s not really good

      *for you it isn’t

      the search sucks

      what’s wrong with it? works fine for me

      no offline mode on desktop

      why would you need it? it’s supported on phones, just listen via phone?

      no official Linux client

      Neither does apple music. Tidal are open sourcing their SDK though

      an incomplete catalog

      *for you. for me there isn’t

      It’s not worth it, even if they are the least bad for paying artists

      Again, for you. On paper, tidal is the better option and I rather support artists than some questionable monopolistic corporation

      • tutus@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is perhaps the stupidest response I’ve read on Lemmy for a while. Nobody is entitled to an opinion these days.

        Im expecting a response, quoting each paragraph I wrote, with only ‘For you’ as the text.

        • jul@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I don’t agree. He wrote it like it was absolute, whereas it’s a personal opinion. Like you stated correctly.

          • SitD@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            8 months ago

            well it’s neither nor. I’m also pissed that there’s no Linux client, and they didn’t even try to make their windows client run in wine. so it’s not just one person’s opinion as i hereby confirm.

            • jul@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              8 months ago

              Not saying it’s not a valid point against tidal overall. I would also enjoy me a linux native client. However I don’t see why this is a valid point against tidal and for apple music.

              Having said that. I found a bug in their windows client and the devs are very much receptive for feedback. Maybe in the future when more people use Linux they’ll come around and make one. Or the community will with tidal’s open source SDK.

              • GeekySalsa@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                8 months ago

                Why do you keep mentioning apple music? OP never made any comparison to it or any other streaming service. He just communicated why the service didn’t work for him and you felt compelled to inform him that how he feels is his opinion?

                • jul@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  You’re missing the point I’m trying to make. He’s stating his opinion, which his absolutely valid for him, but concludes that in general it’s not worth it and that it is not good. The only thing I did was mark his opinions, also mark my opinions, but conclude that in the general case there’s no better option. I only wanted to draw attention to this style of rhetoric which I don’t like as a discussion culture.

                  Btw I also don’t like the ad homimen argument e.g. “stupidest comment I’ve seen” etc. That’s not how a respectful discussion should be.

      • loics2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Damn, you’re shilling hard!

        I don’t want to use my phone for basic features like the offline mode, I’m not always connected to the internet on my laptop, that’s it.

        I don’t care about Apple music, and almost every streaming platform provides some kind of SDK. It doesn’t change the fact that I don’t have a Linux client, and probably never will (or at least feature-complete) because they partly use Dolby Atmos, which is a closed-source licensed format.

        And no, even on paper, tidal’s not the better option to support artists. Buy tracks on Bandcamp, buy merch and vinyl directly from artists…

        • jul@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m talking in the context of streaming services here…

          Maybe you’re right with the Linux client part, but I don’t know any other streaming service that does provide one? At least Spotify and Apple Music don’t. Does it make them also not worth it? I would disagree.

          I never said tidal is the best app to support artists. In that regard there is a better option, just give them your money for free. I meant as a streaming service, quality wise and in terms of paying artists, there are no better options.

          What I didn’t like about your OP was the fact that you laid your personal opinions out and then concluded that tidal is not worth it. Doesn’t make me a shill when I answer with counterpoints.

        • jul@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          What do you mean? I’m interested in his opinion and he wrote it like it was an absolute fact. Poor way to start a discussion imo.

          • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s his opinion, that’s the fact for him. How obtuse do you have to be to waste your time like that?

            • jul@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’m not arguing against his personal opinions, I’m arguing against his conclusion that tidal is not worth it (for everyone,because that is how it is worded).

              How is it of your concern how I spend my time?

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        no offline mode on desktop

        why would you need it? it’s supported on phones, just listen via phone?

        So you’re saying this use case works for you??