• Clent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes. This is called Nanny State.

    Rather than educate the populace, take away the tools. Of course, another tool will just rise to the surface but it will make a lot of people feel really good that they did something.

    I do appreciate all of the reactionary statements. I don’t use TikTok but I do believe in freedom. Reducing freedoms, no matter how well intentioned does not solve societies problems.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You can’t educate dementia away. You can educate youth away, but that takes years, which would effectively be a ban for them. TikTok is not a tool for its users, it is a tool for a for profit corporation and by extension their associated foreign dictatorship.

      Absolute freedom should not extend to harming each other.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        TikTok is not a tool for its users, it is a tool for a for profit corporation

        That pretty much describes every corporation in existence.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Some of them provide utility and some don’t, which is why we don’t allow children to drink, smoke, or gamble. If a company providing those goods and services targets those demographics it gets political action.

          Welcome to the nuance of society and the modern world.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            But they’re not disallowing children smoking, drinking, or gambling here. It’s more akin to disallowing children from drinking Smirnoff, smoking Marlboros, or playing blackjack and nothing else.

              • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                If this had anything to do with children, they’d be reigning them all in at once instead of wasting time singling one of many out.

                • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Even equating the arm of a militaristic expansionist dictatorship to a tech giant is disingenuous to its core, Google collects a shit ton of data but even that pales in comparison to TikTok’s absurd collection. But all of that aside, your argument is shit. Reign in every tech giant at once? Why? Why the hell is it all or none? I don’t even think the US Federal Government in its current state has enough authority to try that, at this point.

                  That’s like choosing not to take a doctor’s license away unless you can take away every bad doctor’s license in the USA at one time.

      • Clent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        TikTok is one of hundreds of vectors to swindle the senile and I doubt it’s even in the top 10.

        Grandpa needs to have someone else handling his finances. It’s not the governments job and let’s not pretend this bill is about keeping grandpas money safe.