Microsoft, doing it’s part to make the world a better place.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Support is a major cost/pain point, that Linux pushers just don’t get.

      They’ve never worked in enterprise (or hell, even in SMB IT). Moving from windows Hu doesn’t make sense. It’s a lot if cost, up front, to take on lots of risk.

      I’m not sure Linux will ever significantly compete with Windows for the desktop. At a minumim it would require a single shell to become dominant, in addition to all the compatibility issues you mention.

      Then there’s management: Windows has SCOM, with a well-established app packaging/distribution model, settings config, user management (AD/Exchange), etc, etc.

      Linux is fantastic as a base OS for other stuff. Like Proxmox/TrueNAS, or to use as a server with containerized services. There’s a million ways Linux is the answer, a much better one, than Windows - largely in the server/services hosting realm

    • Jason Kraus@social.rootaccess.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      @FonsNihilo @kescusay this is painfully true. I remember some well meaning techies wired up an entire lab for the school district once, included free repurposed PCs running Linux. Didn’t take long before the district paid HP to take all of it away and give us the crappiest speced machines tax money could buy. But hey, that deal gave the football team money to AstroTurf the field (with a donation from HP)🤦‍♂️

    • LockheedTheDragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Your post reminded me. I worked tech support for years at an ISP and we would not help people with Linux systems. Only Windows or Macs. Android on a cell but only help with connecting to Wi-Fi and very basic settings up email if they used the ISP email.

    • someguy3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think your info is out of date, at least from what I see. Schools are going to Chromebooks because that’s all the budget allows. I think it’s going to be scary when these kids enter the workforce and can’t use Windows office.

        • someguy3@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Sigh, yes everyone knows that ChromeOS is built on linux. That’s not what people mean when they say running linux.

          AFAIK Chromebooks can run Office 365 (the online one, whatever it’s called now). Microsoft had to do that to try to keep Office relevant and accessible.

          How do you break away from something you were programmed to use?

          You don’t, you get the next generation to use your product first. They start with chromebooks in elementary school now. That’s the first computer kids will have and likely have all the way to grade 12 for school (after that is who knows what). Kids today will be programmed to use Chromebooks, not windows. That’s my point.