When they say that “they have an army of lawyers” or that Disney has more lawyers than animators and things like that, do they tho? Is an army of lawyers really effective? Do companies actually have an “army” of lawyers to redact and sign documents?

  • dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Basically it means that they can handle lots of cases at the same time while still giving each one as much attention as it needs. Winning or losing a difficult case can often be decided by how much time and expertise you can put into it. When you have a lot to lose, would you rather have a team of lawyers, each specializing in a different aspect that’s relevant to the case or a single lawyer who is overworked because he‘ll have to prepare a different case after lunch?

    Edit: typo

    • slowwooderrunsdeep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      The scope and visibility of the case is important, as well. Complex cases require lots of lawyers with different specialties to look at it from different angles.

      Similar in engineering, you want more engineers working on a really big and complex project than just one person. I worked with a firm back in the day that designed a stadium - they had a whole floor of their HQ devoted to engineers who only worked on that project.

    • oxjox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I would imagine it’s only matter of time before AI can do the majority of the work for law firms. I’ll have to ask my IP lawyer friend about this.

        • rdyoung@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          First off, it’s not AI, it’s llm, basically a better way to collate and search data. It’s a tool that they should be using for research but they better not be using chatgpt or any of the other publicly available ones. I would hope that by now someone has launched or is working on one that was trained with data from law books, existing case law, etc and then you could also feed it any discovery documents that come in and it can help highlight what is important.

          • Atemu@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            a better way to collate and search data

            [citation needed]

            Though I’m sure your LLM could hallucinate some for you!

            • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I love that term “hallucinate”.

              That’s a big of a euphemism as the word “faith”, and like the term “faith”, it’s used to mask glaring operational deficiencies. It reminds me of the time when I test drove a used car and there was a clear steering issue, which the car salesman called a “shimmy”.