I can’t believe I have to defend reddit for once.

  • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    9 months ago

    Both sides suck here but I have to side with Reddit over patent trolls. Nokia, what a disgrace you are these days if you have to resort to patent trolling. You used to be cool. That said, if this hurts Reddit’s IPO then I’ll be happy anyways.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Enforcing a patent is not necessarily patent trolling. Is Nokia’s sole purpose to collect patent for things they have no intention or capability to create and sell? That’s the definition of a patent troll. Nokia doesn’t exist solely to collect patents and make their revenue by suing actual business.

      We got people out here mad at shit they don’t even understand…

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        If you’re enforcing a patent that would have been come up with other people in the same field, then the patent is invalid, many of us would consider going after people with an invalid patent – patent trolling.

        Patents are meant for UNIQUE ideas and things that nobody else would have come up with on their own. But increasingly they’re being used for obvious ideas that thousands of other people also have around the same time, to lock out competition.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      There’s a difference between patent trolling and protecting their patents.

      Provided Nokia just won a case, it’s extremely doubtful they would fall into the “troll” catagory.

      Why do you think they’ve become a disgrace?