• Endward23@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    So much for free markets, democracy and freedom of speech.

    I don’t know whether Spain cares a lot about “free market” at the moment.

    Even if I get your point and would even make a similiar point in a privat conversation, there is still a problem. The problem, if and how the Freedom of Speech implies that you can use a certain service you choice. If this implication were true, would it not mean that the provider of the named service has a duty to provide you a access, too?

    Yes, they blocked it because of copyright infringement but let’s face it, piracy should be viewed as a market option for people to get their content,

    There are messenger out there, which are more privacy as Telegram. Eg. Signal, Threemea, mostly services based on XMPP and Matrix.

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The problem, if and how the Freedom of Speech implies that you can use a certain service you choice. If this implication were true, would it not mean that the provider of the named service has a duty to provide you a access, too?

      Why would the provider be responsible for the fact that some government is a piece of shits and tries to restrict people’s freedoms? A private messenger company will always be weaker than a government with infinite funding and resources.

      There are messenger out there, which are more privacy as Telegram. Eg. Signal, Threemea, mostly services based on XMPP and Matrix.

      I never said there weren’t, I just said that govts shouldn’t meddle in this things.