I am not a native English speaker and I have sometimes referred to people as male and female (as that is what I have been taught) but I have received some backlash in some cases, especially for the word “female”, is there some negative thought in the word which I am unaware of?

I don’t know if this is the best place to ask, if it’s not appropriate I have no problem to delete it ^^

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Female as an adjective is perfectly fine.

    A female patient, a female politician, a female customer, etc. That’s the best way to refer to those.

    What’s bad is using ‘female’ as a noun: "A female. "

    In general, you just don’t use adjectives-as-nouns to refer to people. You don’t call someone “a gay”, “a black”, or “a Chinese”. That is offensive, and “a female” has the same kind of feel.

    (there are exceptions to the above: you can call someone ‘an American’ or 'A German", but not “A French”. I don’t understand why - if you can’t feel your way, best just avoid it)

    Now, you could get around it by calling someone “a female person” - except that we already have a word for “female person”, and that’s “woman”. And to go out of your way to avoid saying “woman” makes you sound like some kind of incel weirdo, and you don’t want that.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      And to go out of your way to avoid saying “woman” makes you sound like some kind of incel weirdo, and you don’t want that.

      I’d just like to emphasise this. It’s not that using a different term is intrinsically bad, it’s just that the people who tend to do it are not cool and you don’t want to look like you’re associated with them.

        • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s ridiculous that a perfectly fine word is seen as insult used by a certain type of people.

          That’s how association works

          I can have the best and most lasting solution to a problem ever, but my company still won’t allow me to put “THE FINAL SOLUTION” in marketing copy.

          And they shouldn’t.

          • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            So you say … The word describing a biological fact, and a national socialist euphemism for mass murdering millions of people are the same?

            • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              So you say … The word describing a biological fact, and a national socialist euphemism for mass murdering millions of people are the same?

              Do you even hear yourself?

              Engage in good faith or sod off.

    • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Interesting point with adjectives vs nouns.

      ‘a Frenchman’ would be more correct than ‘a French’. Because French is only an adjective, while American and German are both nouns and adjectives. But Frenchman is not gender neutral like German or American.

      Could go with Francophone, but that’s any french speaking person so that includes canadians, africans, etc.

      And, it would seem to make sense to go with Frank, but the Franks were originally germans, then expanded their territory to include France, and the name stuck there but not in their original territory, so is it really correct to refer to the French as Franks? Since no one does it, I would guess not.

      • amelia@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not a native speaker here. Would a French woman also be 'a Frenchman’s and if not, how would you refer to a French woman correctly?

        • locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          3 years ago, “man” in that context was considered gender neutral. More recently tho a lot of stink is being made about little language things like this. Theres no replacement word to use.

            • locuester@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Sensitivities during Covid ran high. A lot of things changed then. For instance in the software world removing the name “master” from git usage, and on the TV Show Survivor, the host not saying his famous line “come on in guys”. At the same time pronouns became a huge thing, and these seemingly gender specific or sensitive word terms were targeted.

              You are correct, there was a round of this in the 90s or so, where job titles like “waitress”, “stewardess”, “policeman” were all adjusted. I see that as a very different round of language change.

                • locuester@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Yeah, 2020 is the time period I’m referring to. I had never heard of it being a thing until George Floyd and BLM movement in 2020, then GitHub changed in response to that.

                  I’ve been in IT for 35 years. And I never heard a single negative thing about branch names and master/slave terminology until 2020.

                  Perhaps you think that was set aside because IDE hard drives are dead.

    • Anamnesis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You can soften “a black” or “a Chinese” entirely by adding “person” to the end of it. English is weird.