• BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m not even sure they’re going to bin it. Maybe shed the last-profitable customers to maximize profit from the large consumers. At least for a few years.

    Call me cynical, but to me it’s about pushing consumers (SMB) to cloud providers instead of virtualizing on-prem with VMware. Broadcom can still sell VMware and support to larger vendors, or to SMB’s for a heftier profit margin.

    I can only hope many SMB’s have support vendors who see the value in shifting to TrueNAS, Proxmox, etc (there are vendors who provide support contracts for those Open-source packages).

    • bluGill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The problem with large customers is they can see value and if you charge too much it goes they can build their own.

      • tabris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        I just left one of the UK’s largest VMWare customers, in a team working directly on VSphere and ESXI products. The team was just starting to tool up for a new internal project to manage VMs within the company using some of the newer features in these tools. We had well over 1 million VMs across more than a dozen datacenters. The cost of running this is expected to go up by 30 times or more.

        While it’s going to take some time, they’re now looking at migrating to a different solution. So Broadcom are going to get their extra pay for a while, but not forever.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not by next quarter. By the time that happens, this set of execs will be already at the next company.

          • maynarkh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Even if they do, they get bonuses for short term stock gain, not long term stuff. If the going gets bad, they totally do bail. Some companies - khm Reddit khm - even bring in execs just to take a fall when that happens, only for the same guys who set the problem up to take back the reins after the fallout.

            • bluGill@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              They generally have a large part of their net worth in company stock and are getting options. Thus long term matters.

              • Maddier1993@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                It’s supposed to work like that. You’re naive to think it actually does work like that for a majority of companies nowadays.