• treefrog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Considering how buggy the release builds are I can’t believe they’re having that much fun.

    • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Forget the release builds. Bethesda full releases are usually buggy as hell. Fallout 3 and Skyrim on PS3 were nigh on unplayable at release.

      • treefrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t know why anybody downvoted you, but by release build I think we are talking about the same thing.

        My comment was basically I don’t buy Bethesda products until they’ve been on the market for at least a year because they’re so fucking buggy and I know they’re going to go on sale anyway.

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    As much as I want this to be true, I’ll have a hard time not filing this under “GRR Martin and Patrick Rothfuss cowriting a new series” level of believing it will finish any time soon.

  • kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    And what are the odds it’s running on the zombie of Creation engine again? That was just delightful for Starfield.

    • nac82@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Starfield killed all my hype for Bethesda’s future releases. Every step forward comes with a dozen steps back.

      How long ago did Starfield come out, like 6+ months ago? And they’ve basically added an eat button back from previous games on the same engine, then left it to rot.

      I can’t believe they are already trying to market ES6 and DLC for Starfield without even fixing that trash game first.

      • mommykink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Bethesda’s M.O. has always been to release a playable, if not bare and buggy, sandbox and let the modders liven it up and smooth out the experience. The only thing that’s changed is that Starfield is fundamentally not a good game that modders aren’t interested in messing with and would need almost a entire rebuild to get to that point.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          I partlially disagree because Skyrim was a fun game without mods. Mods gave it more replayability and elevated it to its iconic status today…but yeah, still a good game (at the time) without them!

        • nac82@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Nah, their earlier games had spirit. Oblivion is still one of my favorite open world fantasy games to date.

          Starfield is just a soulless recycled scrap for money and hype.

      • fjordbasa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m inclined to agree. I don’t hate starfield, I really don’t. It may be obvious to others, but I’ve been trying to nail down why. I think a big part of it is the space travel. If a mission isn’t confined to a planet- hopefully an interesting planet, then you find yourself hopping from planet to planet- which means loading screens every time you jump- which kills any momentum that I personally feel. Sure you had to load if you fast traveled in fallout or elder scrolls, but you COULD walk across the map of the whole game if you really wanted to