• prole@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    1 year ago

    The first part of your comment may be true, but it’s leaving out an important caveat: he’s very much directly responsible for the current state of his party, and the rabid base he helped create.

    I think that’s some important context.

    • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m scarcely excusing his actions on a number of fronts, especially the SCOTUS clusterfuck he engineered. But his support for riling the base up was of the Tea Party, not MAGA, flavour.

      • EvilColeslaw@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        But his support for riling the base up was of the Tea Party, not MAGA, flavour.

        That seems like a distinction without a difference.

        • MrBusiness@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the point they’re trying to make is ‘McConnell might be horrendous shit, but at least he’s not horrendous diarrhea’.

      • prole@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s literally the leader of the legislative branch of the Republican party. It would be absurd to act like he bears no responsibility for the direction of his party.

      • Unaware7013@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        But his support for riling the base up was of the Tea Party, not MAGA, flavour.

        “He wanted a Squirtle, not a Blastoise”

    • SomeGuyNamedPaul@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s one of the elements holding back the monster he created. MFer vetoed his own bill after Obama came out in support of it.