This shouldn’t come as a huge surprise. Meta is moving forward with their plans for Theads and the Fediverse, and their adjusted terms reflect a new impending reality for Fediverse users.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So if I read this right, no big deal as long as you don’t interact with threads stuff on the fediverse?

    • andresil@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s definitely creating more of a case to defederate from it if it ever tries to federate

    • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s not how I read it, but I’m not going to claim to be a fediverse expert. That post specifically says:

      Provided that a Third Party User is followed by or following a Threads account, Meta will ingest these pieces of data specifically:

      To me, this reads as, even if a Threads user follows you, your info gets chewed up by Meta.

      In other words, if you post somewhere on the Fediverse, and some Threads user bumps into it, they can follow you, and that will send all that data to Meta. And it looks to include data well beyond the post the Threads user saw.

      To me, this is a “sound the alarm” moment. If you came here to avoid Meta’s data harvesting, this sounds like you at least need to be on an instance defederated from threads, but I’m not sure even that’s enough.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Correct. Though interaction also means, a Threads user following you or replying to one of your comments or posts.