• vanderbilt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      OMG is it bad. We used a couple WD drives for a surveillance camera array and they didn’t last a year. Two drives failed 9 months apart. Ended up going on Blackblaze and picking what looked best for our XFS Raid 10 having learned that lesson the hard way.

    • CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yeah our company learned the hard way when they bought out G-DRIVE. Got a line failure on 4x 20TB drives.

      Switched back to LaCie and Glyph.

  • Endorkend@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 months ago

    I have a dual NVMe USB3 caddy that’s smaller than most 2.5 HDD housings with currently 2 2TB drives, you can buy 4 and 8TB nvme drives these days too. I can throw that thing out a car and it won’t care.

    And the drives are easily swappable and so are the electronics in the casing.

    So no, 2.5" HDD’s still are an utterly dead end of technology.

    Especially with these and some other vendors, the USB interface is part of the drive (there’s no SATA port on them), so you can’t swap them or take them out for data recovery. They are HDD tech, which doesn’t do shocks or any other sort of roughhousing, they are slow as shit and use far more power than any NVMe drive.

      • Endorkend@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Looks like this one except that it is sealed on one end and the caddies for the two drives have a cover plate that screws in over a gasket and rubber ring.

        I got it in a shop in Hong Kong when I was there for a convention earlier this year. No idea if you can find it online, maybe somewhere like Alibaba.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      They’re external, you’re not going to be using them for performance anyway.

      • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        True, but to a point. Being external, it’d be something I plug in occasionally to back up large project files. I don’t technically need blazing speeds but I’d still be displeased if my transfers took 10 minutes or more.

      • shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, I should’ve added - whether the write speed matters depends on your own use case.

        For my SMR drive, it’s taking roughly 2GB of backup files every few hours, in the background, and there’s plenty of empty space on the drive. In my case, it doesn’t matter at all.

        However, if you’re sat at your computer, frequently transferring large files while the drive is at least half full, and you have to wait for completion… Then it’ll matter.

  • gradyp@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Bought some of the old versions for backup drives. That was a mistake.

      • KaRunChiy@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        Very high failure rate. even sony 2.5’s have a similar rate of death. For some reason this form factor is just terrible for longevity

        • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          My bet is on density. You cram so much in such a tiny space, so any tiny imperfection or fault will corrupt the data or render the drive unusable.

          • gradyp@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            At the time it was fine. I had an array of 4tb drives that I was backing up with a series of 5gb drives. They were just so unreliable; all but one failed while the array they backed up is still spinning strong.

        • gradyp@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Bingo. Sorry, had typed a reply about my failure rate and difficulties getting an RMA but forgot to submit.

      • gradyp@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not exactly reliable and less than easy rma process.

        Sorry, had typed this and forgotten to hit submit :(

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    I paid around $300 for one of the first 2TB drives. Surprisingly it hasn’t come that far

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve got the 5TB version of this drive as a backup for my gaming laptop. Haven’t had any problems with it.

    • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Videography
      Photography
      Downloading Machine Learning Models
      Data for Training ML Models
      Training ML Models
      Gaming (the games themselves or saving replays)
      Backing up movies/videos/images etc.
      Backing up music
      NAS

      Take your pick, feel free to mix and match or add on to the list.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Scientific workloads often involve very large datasets. It might be high resolution data captured from various sensors, or it might be more “normal” data but in huge quantities. Assuming the data itself is high quality, larger datasets mean more accurate conclusions.