• mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I get the sentiment, that we’re not killing nature, just ourselves, but “nature” is not one thing. Killing nature amounts to humans causing incredible suffering to untold trillions of individual animals each with a lilfe, a consciousness.

    I saw my Kitty suffocate due to embolism and had to put her down and it’s no less of an awful event because it was a cat and not a human, it screwed me up and it was years ago. I imagine that level of needless suffering happening every day X 1 billion due to human greed and apathy.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      “Nature” also has lots of suffering in it even without our help. I agree we shouldn’t cause undue harm, but the suggestion that animals won’t suffer without us is naïve at best.

      My condolences for your kitty, but nature would not have granted her the more peaceful end you gave her.

      • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Pretty sure I already specified unnecessary suffering, I didn’t suggest that animals wouldn’t suffer without us.