• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    Maybe this indicates that the FDA’s investigations have shown that Neuralink isn’t quite as awful at this as random internet commentators believe.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Still a questionable decision. Brain interface tech isn’t even that new or novel, but the real bottleneck is that flesh is temporary, eventually the attachment place will die and be replaced. That’s exactly what we saw with their first brain chip and other attempts going back at least 50 years.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nope, I hate musk so everything he is associated with has to be the worst thing ever and pure evil.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Unironically yes, he’s just throwing money at scifi concepts and hoping it pays off.

        • Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Well there are EVs everywhere now, Starlink is breaking ISP regional monopolies and providing rule areas/countries with internet, and SpaceX is the leading frontier of human exploration technology. The ol’Muskrat is a real piece of work, but it sounds kinda ridiculous when you downplay obvious successes.

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Tesla is 19.9% of EV market share, Starlink isn’t “breaking monopolies” it is one, and SpaceX has accomplished some great things by underpaying engineers.

            In most of these cases, Elon Musk hasn’t been taking an active role in the companies, part of the reason he was denied his 56Bn Bonus that he is currently desperately trying to pay himself out of Tesla’s finances.

            • Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yeah Tesla is down to 20% because of the massive EV boom THEY started. Saying Starlink is one of the ISP monopolies people can choose from, is an oxymoronic statement. Agreed about SpaceX. Pay your amazing eng team!

              I’m not saying Elon is a great leader. But the odds 3 things he owns happened to take off isn’t likely a total coincidence. Maybe he’s just better than average at predictions. But to act like it isn’t what it is because you don’t like the guy, kinda undercuts legitimate criticism.

        • FMT99@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          This one paid off. Read the interviews given by mr Arbaugh. Musk is an ego-driven maniac, you won’t get any argument from me. But as a result a bunch of scientists got more funding than they normally would for this project that gave great joy and some measure of independence to a young quadriplegic, maybe with more to follow.

          You want to hate on Musk? I’ll happily join you. But if you’re one of those assholes rooting against these doctors and scientists doing ground breaking work with Musk’s money, that’s a pretty terrible take.

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            The chips are attached to impermanent brain flesh. That has been the brick wall in our way for fifty years. Any benefit is short term, and the long term implications are harrowing. This field would have advanced at roughly the same rate without subjecting people and animals to undue risks.