• macrocephalic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s almost like some useless person created a variable with a distinct set unlikely to be higher than the hundreds as a floating point - when it obviously should have been an int.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, it makes sense to use a floating point number here, since unless the test is marked out of a factor of 100 then there will likely be a fractional value as the final percentage. The mistake was not rounding the final displayed value.