Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

  • lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    please take a look at the replies under zuck’s own post in threads.net and determine if that’s the type of content you want.

    for those who don’t want to visit, majority of the commentators are bots. some advertising crypto, and others asking for money.

    even if you think you can individually block those accounts, keep in mind the size of threads compared to fediverse.
    for Lemmy: monthly active users are barely 150K40K, while for threads it’s 100 million. there’s no chance you can control that inflow of bots.

    and if it still doesn’t convince you, you can read threads’ privacy policy, which states that they’ll gather all that pii if you interact with their content.

    most of the internet is already bigtech, I don’t want Lemmy to become another arm of it. though I have faith in my instance maintainer and dessalines, the dev.

  • Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    For default, they are unfederated in threads.

    Also, are you sure you want the mass don’t know what the federated web is? We are a low number of users. If we want to me the new standard of internet, we need the people to know what de Fediverse is. And threads can be that first door, and then they can start to spread to other more suitable stances.

    I just want to extend the conversation.

    • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      For default, they are unfederated in threads.

      Do you mean instances have just all unfederated or that it’s built into Lemmy itself?

      I haven’t heard anything on threads in a while so I’m not sure how well it took off but I agree that having something like threads could bring in more users.

      Honestly I like the vibe of Lemmy and the fediverse now but I definitely do miss how there was a community for everything.

      • Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        A friend of mine made a threads account, and for his account being federated, the need to search in the settings a box of “Want your account to access the fediverse?” and the default is off

  • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Let’s not defederate from every corporate player. Some of them can probably respect reasonable rules of civility.

    But fuck Meta. We already know how this plays out.

    We know there’s a huge wave of hatred and misinformation incoming. We’ve seen it on their other platforms.

    • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There was an interesting paired poll done, asking about federation with Threads and federation with Tumblr.

      66% of people were wary of or actively opposed federating with Threads. Fewer than 20% were wary of or actively opposed federating with Tumblr.

      It’s not “defederate from every corporate player”. It’s passing this message on to Meta:

      A very ornate "fuck off"

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    If anybody remembers XMPP being widespread and what Facebook, Google, Apple and others (say, I personally remember VK and Yandex in Russia supporting it) did to it, that’s what will happen if you “wait and see”.

    EDIT: oh, half the thread is such comments

  • chitak166@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I want a server where users can make these decisions for themselves.

    Fuck this mob-mentality spurred upon by losers.

  • bluefirex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    And another attempt at blanket hating on a platform for no reason. Be more original, people.

    Edit: if YOU don’t like it, sure block it. But don’t force your backwards decision on everyone else.

  • OtherPetard@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Better yet, let them enjoy the full connectivity for a month. Once they’ve enjoyed all the awesome content and got used to it - defederate.

  • letsmakeafriendship@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    In favor of defederation. If I start seeing garbage from threads in my feed, I’m switching instances. I don’t want Meta pushing their divisive, hateful, misinformation all up in my feeds. Meta will kill fedi. We don’t need them.

    • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yeah. I’ll switch to an instance that is defederated from Threads, if mine doesn’t.

      I left Meta’s other properties to avoid state sponsored hate speech. I won’t use a platform that gives hate speech a platform.

      I don’t need to wait to know if Meta will do that. I already know.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Great thing about the fediverse

      People get to decide what they want from their platform

      • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Surely you’re aware of the embrace, extend, extinguish corporate strategy.

        People only get to decide what they want from their platform until facebook starts extending the spec. Then your client will become incompatible with some posts, and so on and so forth.

        In summary, it’s a threat to the platform itself.

      • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Exactly, I hereby decide that I would like to ignore corporate efforts to undermine this burgeoning new platform. I furthermore reserve the right to complain about the loss of said platform in future years by claiming that it’s everyone elses fault for allowing corporate encroachment.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Then go join threads.net? Nobody’s stopping you from doing that. That would put you on a server friendly to your beliefs.

      Server admins also have opinions, and are not required to take a democratic vote and each individual user’s choice into account. They can decide for themselves, and they will, for good or ill. If you don’t like where it ends up, your user decision should be to fuck off to threads.

      • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t want to join a proprietary service, but I want to be able to communicate with people who chose to join it.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t think that’s what they’re saying.

        They’re saying that some users and admins might choose to wait and see

        • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          “Yes, Jeffrey has, in the past, killed and eaten gay men. But we should wait and see. It’s impolite not to invite him to the party!”

          • Otter@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I don’t want to use their platform, but I get why some people might choose to stay federated so that there is incentive to pull people to mastodon and educate people about the issues

            There’s enough nuance there that I’m not dead set on either side, and I think we still have the chance to defederate later if there’s an increase in spam and harmful content / disinformation.

            • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              “Jeffrey doesn’t always eat people. Just sometimes. We should totally go clubbing with him and spurn him later if he eats one of us.”

    • net00@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is a bigger issue to leave it to users imo. Like lemm.ee admin said a few months ago, threads is too fucking big.

      Anything they push on the fediverse will be what users see in All. Plus, popular stuff on threads is determined through Facebook’s algorithm, and it will also determine the fediverse recommendations by consequence.

      The above is solvable if you block them I guess, but by default it will completely ruin everything.

      However, lemmy 0.19 block feature doesn’t work on users of an instance, only posts hosted in an instance. Add to this that Facebook is a cancerous company making all its money from ads. Expect their bots to comment and make posts pushing ads on all instances.

      All of this will also mean high workload on mods to regulate the content. Threads doesn’t bring anything good here, and defederation is probably the only way to protect us.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The above is solvable if you block them I guess, but by default it will completely ruin everything.

        Yes. One minute of a user’s time and all that’s gone.

        Compare that with having to move instances due to admins blocking at the instance level.

      • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You understand that no matter how much you kneel down to service Meta, Zuck the Fuck won’t be trickling anything down on you that isn’t a bodily fluid, right?

        And hey, I’m not going to kink-shame. Just pointing out that if that isn’t your specific kink, you might want to wake up to there being zero dollars trickling down to you.

        • Asuka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          What a meaningless, worthless comment. Letting Threads federate with the rest of the Fediverse doesn’t give Zuckerberg power over us (unless you’d care to explain how it does) - rather, it just gives its users and our users the ability to interacted. Why are you so interested in building walls?

          • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I swear, I’m seeing the western equivalent of wumaos servicing Meta here. Only at least the wumaos got paid; it made sense. These idiots are doing the labour for free!

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is why I don’t understand all the hysteria about this.

      If I don’t want to see Threads or I don’t want Threads to see me, I can go to a Threads account and click “block threads.net”.

      But obviously that’s too complicated and it’s easier to just whinge to your instance admin about how Threads federation will be the death of us all. 🙄

      • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        If there was a bot that just flooded All with far right talking points, do you think admins ought to block that or leave it to the users?

        What if it was far right mixed in with cat memes?

        What if it started more slowly like a few posts an hour and then ramped up over 6 months to be 1000s of posts per hour?