• CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Eh, I don’t love IGN but it seems like at this point nothing they do makes people happy. I remember when they gave Starfield a 7 people rioted lol, even tho the score was entirely deserved.

    • Eggyhead@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Bethesda should have put “Mario” or “Zelda” in the title if they wanted better scores from IGN.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Were people angry because it was low or high? I’d give it a lower score personally, though I’ve still seen some people argue it’s a perfect game

      I’d say it deserves a perfectly mediocre 5. Everything it does is better in other games, and the one thing it’s supposed to do (exploration) is better in their other games. I live sci-fi so I was willing to overlook a lot of issues, but I think the biggest letdown is that the sci-fi stories it tells are boring as hell and don’t actually make use of the genre. If they really wanted to make a sci-fi game they should have been ready to tell interesting sci-fi stories. Instead they gave up all the strengths of their other games to tell uninteresting stories.

      • CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        There’s an extension for YouTube dislikes if you’re curious. That video got slammed with them.

        Granted, people eventually agreed that the game was pretty mediocre. But at the time the only people that had played it were the diehards that paid extra for early access, and they were livid.