• circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 months ago

    OP’s claim here is just BS. PornHub is in no way a monopoly or even close. It reads like someone who has literally never searched for porn on the internet. Astroturf.

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      PornHub is a monopoly. They own xnxx, redtube, xhamster, and several production companies such as brazzers. Their categorization system has also had some ranging impacts on actresses’ ability to get work after they turn 22. I highly recommend listening to The Butterfly Effect by Jon Ronson.

      ALSO so we’re clear, I’m not a fan of this legislation because its dumb as fuck and doesn’t help anyone, least of all sex workers. When people lose easy access to porn it usually results in WORSE conditions for sex workers because suddenly there’s more demand in places without safety infrastructure.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Can you define what part of PornHub owning a lot of other porn sites makes them a monopoly? Part of being a monopoly is being anticompetitive. What has PornHub done in terms of lobbying or other anticompetitive practices which makes it more difficult for a new company sharing porn to take hold? Because there is a ton of porn online which is unrelated to PornHub.

        I’m all for calling out monopolies, but I legit don’t see one here. I’m open to being wrong.

        I don’t believe that the thing about actresses getting work after 22 is reliant on PornHub. Porn has worked that way for 50+ years my dude.

        • veroxii@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah I was just in Utah for business and didn’t even realise there was a block. I didn’t go to pornhub but all my regular sites just worked. 🤷‍♂️🍆

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Part of being a monopoly is being anticompetitive

          No it’s not. Being hit with antitrust laws requires first being a monopoly, but the monopoly state exists merely by virtue of size within the industry.

          Edit: to be clear the only point I am making here is in relation to that definition you provided. Nothing more.