fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoFCC hits Verizon with $1M fine for dropping 911 calls, again • The Registerwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1312arrow-down13
arrow-up1309arrow-down1external-linkFCC hits Verizon with $1M fine for dropping 911 calls, again • The Registerwww.theregister.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squareP1nkman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40·5 months agoThey won’t notice, as fines are already in the cost projections.
minus-squareOberonSwanson@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·5 months agoThe depressing fact this is already in their calculations really suggests fines should be vary based on a percentage of the company’s profits, not a set number for all.
minus-squareP1nkman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·5 months agoIf you do something illegal, and the result is a fixed fine, it’s only “illegal” for poor people. Rich people dgaf if they have to pay fine/ticket.
minus-squareNABDad@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months agoOr it shouldn’t be a fine, but criminal prosecution for the executives responsible.
minus-squareBakkoda@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoAnd have been passed on to the consumer in doing so.
They won’t notice, as fines are already in the cost projections.
The depressing fact this is already in their calculations really suggests fines should be vary based on a percentage of the company’s profits, not a set number for all.
If you do something illegal, and the result is a fixed fine, it’s only “illegal” for poor people. Rich people dgaf if they have to pay fine/ticket.
Or it shouldn’t be a fine, but criminal prosecution for the executives responsible.
deleted by creator
And have been passed on to the consumer in doing so.