Starfield’s numbers have swollen in early access on streaming and gaming platforms - and the global release is yet to take place.

  • Poopfeast420@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m watching a streamer play the game, and what I see looks like I’d have some fun, and others probably feel the same way.

    I’m just not interested in playing at like 30fps on a 3080. Maybe some patches or driver updates can improve things and I’ll check it out in the Steam Winter Sale or something.

    • Mereo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Being a patient gamer is best. We need to give it at least 6 months for Bathesda to optimize the game and fix the major bugs.

        • Mereo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hope that since Bathesda is now a Microsoft studio, Microsoft is going to be persistent with bug fixes. But maybe it’s a tall order.

          • Ocelot@lemmies.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Microsoft? Fix bugs? Are we thinking of the same microsoft? Best they can do is integrate a weather app nobody asked for. And install candy crush without your consent.

          • Sinnz@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Take a look at Halo Infinite’s networking problems that persist for more than a year.

      • Captain_Ender@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Modders already on top of optimization. DLCC 2.0 mod already out there. Runs 40-50 fps 4K/ultra on my system unmodded. 3080ti, 12900k, 128GB DDR5, m2.

      • Poopfeast420@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        One can hope, but I kinda doubt that they can pull out like a 50% performance uplift, unless there’s just some weird bugs that tank performance.

    • irongamer@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Here are some numbers. I’m at 42 hours played. Resolution 2k, settings are on High. Ryzen 5800x and a Radeon RX 6800xt. The last session of ~5 hours had an average FPS of 108, Starfield is more optimized than BG:3 and Remnant 2… at least for AMD. I had to lower a lot of Remnant 2 settings and it still averages around 55.

      • Virkkunen@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ony 3080 with a 5900x I’m constantly getting 60fps at 1080p (unfortunately for now that’s the only screen I have), meanwhile BG3 would dip to low 10s after a few minutes of playing every time

        EDIT: I would also like to add that I didn’t use DLSS or FSR in both games, since my hardware is more than capable of running both on maximum quality at 60fps 1080p.

        • Poopfeast420@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s exactly what I have, but I play on 3840x1600, 24:10 Ultrawide.

          I don’t remember BG3 giving me any problems, even in Act 3, before the last patch, that supposedly addresses some performance problems. I loaded up a save just now and get ~50fps running around in the Lower City (very short test, only like two minutes). That’s with most settings maxed and DLSS Quality.

          Depending on the area, I’d probably get similar numbers in Starfield (according to the benchmarks I’ve seen), but for me, it’s a difference playing an FPS or isometric RPG.

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve also watched some streams, and the performance hasn’t even been my biggest concern. I’m just… not interested? It hasn’t been gripping me. Even though there are these shiny new things and bells and whistles, it still just looks like another Bethesda game to me, but with a blander setting this time. Though maybe it’s more fun to play than watch. I just haven’t really seen anything that makes me go “goddamn I gotta get a piece of that”.

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      AMD folks are having a good time, but nvidia folks will need to wait. The game is purposefully not optimized for nvidia at the moment due to AMD sponsorship. (Also potentially to point out that many AAA titles tend to be optimized for nvidia but not AMD at launch)

      • Poopfeast420@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That doesn’t explain the CPUs though, since with those, AMD is much worse than Intel, so it’s not just a simple “game is optimized for AMD.”

        • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          CPUs though, since with those, AMD is much worse than Intel

          Simply untrue with later AMD. Slight advantage to Intel, but not the blowout it used to be. Intel loses entirely if power consumption and cost is taken into account.

          But of course, games rely largely on GPU power, and the CPU concern is generally secondary.