• henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Very exciting. I wonder if this means we’ll get some competitive benchmarks instead of the generation or two behind we have been seeing.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well, by the time the Pixel 10 comes out, it’ll be 2 generations after the iPhone that used a SoC from TSMC’s 3nm node (the A17, used in iPhone 15 Pro, launched September 2023). I’d imagine it’ll have caught up some, but will still behind while Apple is presumably launching something from TSMC’s 2nm or A14 node at the same time.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s definitely a moving target and I can see a world where it stays in the same relative position. Moving to a better node is a necessary but not sufficient condition to be competitive.

        • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          I will add that nodes don’t stay still, either. A 2025 run on a node may have a bunch of improvements over a 2023 run on that same node.

          And Google’s jump from Samsung to TSMC itself might be a bigger jump than a typical year over year improvement. Although it could also mean growing pains there, too.

            • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Legacy nodes (known in the industry as “mature” nodes) remain in use after they’re no longer cutting edge. Each run teaches lessons learned for improving yield or performance, so there’s still room for improvement after mass production starts happening.