Absolutely agreed. The equivalent of "Can’t have application shortcuts, you can already find the executables in the file browser* type nonsense IMHO

I would much rather have it in two places where a user would expect it than 1 place a user wouldn’t…

Exactly this myself. Debian lxc with jellyfin repo added, media on ZFS with passthrough mountpoints, very performant and easy to maintain.

Docker just adds layers of complexity for no benefit here

Jellyfin is also conveniently packaged as a .deb and provide a repo for Ubuntu/Debian. It’s pretty easy to spin up a Debian container, add the repo, and apt install jellyfin, IMHO easier than doing the same thing with a VM, then docker…

There’s a huge part of it that is because there’s no communication mechanism to resolve conflict on the road, really.

If you’re stuck behind someone going slower than you want to, how can you clearly communicate that?

Even in a world where you could clearly speak to them, there’s huge potential for disagreement there, and since the only communication mechanisms can very easily be construed as needlessly dangerous or aggressive, of course you’re gonna see frustration and anger as a result

I love the idea of capturing the language for the future, but it’s so sad to think of a spoken language dying.

I guess the first question would be why do you want a double walled glass one?

Isn’t that the opposite? PAL plays at 25fps and ntsc plays at 30. Or is the 4% a result of telecine or something?

Wouldn’t it be cool if we had senators that weren’t dying of old age

Still got loot crates and crap, still not gonna be that into it

There are centrifugal fans that are quite flat but they intake airflow from a different axis they exhaust it from. Could still work

Is there any reason PCs can’t just receive HDMI/displayport input from other devices through the same mechanism they output it?

I’m going to be crude here: is there any reason your bladder can’t slurp your pee back up from the toilet when you’re thirsty?

Can you reverse your monitor to suck in light and behave like a camera?

If you push your car backwards does it suck up CO2 and fill up the gas tank?

Most things in life aren’t as bidirectional as we’d like. Video cards use electrical drivers to push signals down the display cables, which is completely different than using what are basically sensors to detect signals coming the other way. It would be quite expensive to design a GPU that does a good job of both, and mostly pointless.

This is just automatic Photoshop - if all you were doing with graphic design was pasting blond hair onto a brunette, yes, this has really screwed you (or made your job a lot easier). If you’re actually doing any level of design… you’re safe for now

Let me know when I can run it locally… "Open"AI

Calling it radiation gives the layman an implication that it’s dangerous i.e. ionizing radiation. This is electromagnetic radiation, just radio waves.

You don’t need iodine, this isn’t going to give you radiation sickness, but it is a little surprising.

Yes, that’s kind of my point. It implies strength in the bill that really isn’t very strong at all, while staying technically correct

Serious bias in that title. The “strongest” bill is still very weak

To be fair to the other side, it’s entirely possible (and even common) to have worked in a field for 20 years while learning completely incorrect things about it. Or learning nothing.

People say things like “I’ve used a computer every day for 20 years, I think I know how it works” and then ask if they should “reboot the hard drive” and then they power cycle the monitor.

no Internet companies are capable of 46gbs.

IDGAF about the pixel phones but i see this kind of argument all over the place and it’s infuriating. ISPs don’t have to offer 46gbps for wifi6 to be your bottleneck. Imagine having 2gbps internet, talking about how you need to upgrade away from gigabit, and someone goes “well you don’t need 10gigabit(or 2.5 or 5), your ISP isn’t giving you 10gbps.” Sure it isn’t, but it’s still offering more than my current network can enable

Not to mention, wifi never, ever, ever hits advertised speeds. I have wifi 6 and it is a bottleneck on my 2gbps internet with a single device. Imagine having multiple devices!

And even if your internet wasn’t bottlenecked by your wifi, the internet isn’t the only thing your phone can communicate with on a network.

To use the full WiFi bandwidth you’d probably also need to connect your phones antennae to the access points antennae via coax.

Nobody’s ever going to get 46Gb/s with 7 just like nobody actually gets 1gigabit with AC. Real speeds tend to be vastly lower than rated, and splitting the airwaves with other stations is reason enough to minimize transmit time in any case. A busy area is going to benefit from phones having Wi-Fi 7 even if those phones can’t process a 46gbps tcp stream.

It really annoys me when people look at max rates of networking technologies as though they’re minimums for that technology to be useful. You don’t have to use all 10gigabits of 10gbps for the upgrade from gigabit to be worthwhile, same with all others.

Why even pick up? If they aren’t a number I recognize, they can leave a message.