It’s for going #3

👈👈😄

Capital-G Gaga? Like you put on a meat dress or something?

Thanks for some background!

If he lawyer says he’s not, then we have to believe him! /s

I don’t listen to hiphop, and this is the first I’m hearing about this.

UMG approved, published, and launched a campaign to create a viral hit out of a rap track that falsely accuses Drake of being a pedophile and calls for violent retribution against him

This sounds pretty bad. And if UMG marketed it as much as the lawsuit claims, maybe he actually has a case.

And this actually resulted in a shooting and break-ins.

How the heck did he do it?

It needs more color, and less green.

They are too adorable for anything less.

It’s not the writers. It’s the union props team making work for themselves.

Not to me.

The first and final frames are roughly the same color. He’s backlit in the first frame, so you have to compare to the shadow color in the final frame.

In frame 2, the dress is white and gold.

My 18 month old son has pneumonia. Which essential oil should I rub on his feet?

Weird that I get a unique fingerprint in DDG.

Thing is most people just don’t care, and don’t understand it. Also, it turns out it’s really easy to fingerprint people. Your list of installed fonts alone is enough to fingerprint you in many cases, and it’s easy to figure out your entire list of installed fonts with JavaScript.

Add a few more data points like screen size and resolution, user-agent, and you can fingerprint 90% of people. And if that’s not enough, every device—even individual video cards of the same model—renders an HTML canvas differently enough that it’s detectable.

It turns out it’s very hard to not be completely unique when you add all the up.

I feel like it should be a crime to do fingerprinting like this, and to grab and store the browsing habits of every citizen for their whole life, but this is America (for me), and it’s never going to change.

I got it to be random in Fennec. That’s good. A unique, random fingerprint is probably as good as hiding in the crowd. Maybe. I dunno.

I feel like a lot of people on Lemmy will have unique fingerprints due to using uncommon operating systems, browsers, and extensions.

JShelter blocks fingerprinting. uBlock blocks scripts, cookies, and trackers. Trackers are going away, even Google says so, in favor of fingerprinting. Hence why Chrome is moving manifest v3 without third party cookie support. (I hope I got all those facts right.)

How long is this supposed to take? I just get this forever.

Turns out jShelter breaks it completely. It runs instantly in DDG browser and same if I disable jShelter.

I get an F- in both cases. 😅

Thank you. That’s evidence that mine is not being randomized and is unique and repeatable.

I’m on mobile.

I’ve done that, and it’s a little of everything. The page doesn’t offer any advice on how to address anything.

The biggest ones are screen size and user agent. User agent can be faked with an extension. I can’t exactly change my screen size.

I don’t know what exactly what I did, but I managed to improve to “nearly unique” in IronFox. I think all I did was install Cookie Autodelete. It’s an extension I’ve used for a long time in Mull, and finally got around to installing it. Then I installed “User-agent Switcher” and chose a Chrome user-agent and now I’m back to “Unique”. 🤔