The price parity only due to regulations requiring minimum percentage of new cars to be zero or low emission.
The price parity only due to regulations requiring minimum percentage of new cars to be zero or low emission.
Republicans have a 2024 platform. You can Google it.
Again? When did they give it to them the first time?
When they confirmed Clarence Thomas in 1991.
It is actually much worse than that. The problem they are having is that street-running LRT trains get stuck in traffic, causing bunching and other scheduling issues. The obvious solution is to get cars completely out of the way of the trains. But despite an official “transit first” policy, the SFMTA won’t do that. So instead they will spend >$100 million on a new signal system, which will map train locations in real-time simply to tell dispatchers what they already know – that the trains are stuck in traffic.
In California, local government does not get any revenue from speeding tickets. It is one reason there is so little enforcement of traffic laws.
Sure, but the article is claiming EV’s are now as cheap as ICE, which isn’t the case. The price parity is a result of subsidies and mandates. In Calif. we reached price “parity” a long time ago.