majority of people dont give a fuck about that
majority of people dont give a fuck about that
or userContent.css
Thanks, just to clarify, even if I deny all forwards on the host using UFW, that still won’t have an affect on Docker because Docker inserts its rules above UFW rules. Correct?
telling someone asking these questions to read up on networking is the same as telling someone who’s asking why they can’t fly in the air to “just” read up on physics
I’m just curious if I’m missing something and to learn the best practice as well as the reason why it’s the best practice.
How much does it cost to say buy 500 songs? What platform allows you to download songs without DRM?
that’s still a manual process for most apps I’ve tried
Anyone got a source on GrapheneOS recommending Brave?
This is blatantly false.
Your question more relates to security rather than privacy. Tailscale cannot read any of your traffic. It’s all E2EE. Now, is it possible that they’re distributing binaries not built from the open source that contain a backdoor? Sure. But it would be an absolute shitshow, not because you and me but because of the many enterprise customers they have. So I don’t worry about that. Same goes for them going rogue and accessing your devices. For that, there’s Taillock which makes your devices not trust traffic from a device not signed by a trusted node in your Tailnet.
I’d much rather make use of zero-config WG, exit nodes, relay servers, not having to worry about DDNS, solid NAT travelsal, etc. than to worry a company will lose their mind and attack free-plan users.
You can just turn off new devices signing up without manual approval.
How is NAT travelsal handled if you want to connect two devices via WG? That’s what Tailscale primarily does.
Do you not need DDNS for that?
Their employer don’t need their IP address to be able to dox their location. They likely have their physical address already. IP address locations are self-reported, unreliable and usually onyl point to a city or a wider area.
I don’t use Brave. I also don’t mindlessly try to find strawman arguments not to use it. You don’t need to trust the organization to use their open source software, if someone you trust audited it.
Yeah, nothing there justifies calling it spyware. By those metrics Firefox is also spyware.
It’s also outdated af information.
Do you want good products? That happens through telemetry. Simple as that.
I’d expect free software people to not have the funds to sue corporations. Are there any examples of these major lawsuits I can take a look at? I do remember a telecom company in France was fined quite a large sum but that was reported as a rare incident.
I am not saying they shouldn’t have done that. I am saying its not a blocker in mass adoption.