Holy shit this is too real.

“All of the colossal problems facing society will still be charging forward unimpeded, but at least you can feel good about it!”

I guess I’m one of the few here, but I just don’t see what so romantic about two people hearing a loud noise that can be heard from literally miles away.

So you have to fiddle with the volume less on vinyl?

That’s the one good selling point I’ve heard for vinyl so far.

For every story of a person being given a raise, there a million stories of a person fighting for a raise and being denied.

Even the union jobs those others guys are talking about, you know what the raises are in our new contract? Five cents for the equivalent of three years of full time work.

Don’t be fooled by the echo chamber of cushy office jobs that is so prevalent on Lemmy. You hear about these things because almost nobody else here has to work these shitty jobs like we do.

Don’t give the landlords any ideas.

deleted by creator

So today we’re going to learn how to tie a shoe. I like tying shoes, I tie a lot of shoes and I think other people tie shoes too, so I’m doing a video on tying shoes.

Without further ado, let’s jump right in.

So tying shoes is really important. Lots of people tie shoes every day and so it’s something that you need to know. So in this video we’re going to talk about tying shoes. If you want to learn how tie shoes you’re in the right place! We’re talking about tying shoes.

So without further ado, let’s jump right in.

So in this video we’re going to talk about tying shoes … [5 more minutes of talking without actually giving any information whatsoever]

I vastly prefer non-optimal life to not existing at all.

How could you possibly know that? Do you remember not existing?

Is he drinking out of a sippy cup?

I believe that’s a Calvin and Hobbes reference.

That user base is a drop in the ocean compared to most of reddits user base, and those people have all left already.

deleted by creator

This is a contributor post, not a Forbes official article.

I read here recently that the rich people who pay attention to Forbes for investment information avoid all Forbes contributor content and focus only official article from Forbes staff.

I don’t know how true that is, but if you believe it then until a forbes staffer writes about it in an official capacity, it hasn’t actually hit Forbes.

No, Newtonian physics works just fine. Unless things are too big, too small, too fast, or too slow.

At least that’s what a meme I once saw said.

Does watching TV really count as quality time together?

They can actually afford something! Lucky.

I checked again last week: a trailer built in 1974, on 1/4 acre, a two hour drive from my job is $191k.

That’s $84k out of my budget. For a broke down trailer in a neighborhood that might as well be a junkyard.

Fuck the world.

It’s a small enough number you think they could have just said exactly how many there were.

Fewer than 10 … So, 9? 8, perhaps? Surely not 7!

So what are they doing that illegal that other apps aren’t doing??

I really don’t know how to be any more clear with this question.

I read the article too, and those things you quoted sound to me like things every app does.

Hence my question: what is different here?

There’s not a word in this article about why this breach of privacy matters while others do not. It’s not stated whether this was in the terms of service for the app, and whether those terms were ruled against.

All kinds of apps have been selling personal information for a long time, and it’s been ruled before that it’s allowed if they have the proper legalese in the terms of service. Did this app just not have any terms of service?

Why is it a breach of privacy for this app, but other apps doing the same selling of personal data is not?