Exactly. Nazis aren’t human and don’t deserve privacy.
Exactly. Nazis aren’t human and don’t deserve privacy.
Enron? Maybe the SBF thing? Seems like financial scandals are the only thing that matters.
Wow so Brazil has the freest democracy now?
Lol Google scared
Yeah if you think about it the idea of 4 seasons permeating culture has more to do with European colonization than anything scientific.
If you’re trying to apply reason to the theory, I think you’re misunderstanding the theory.
When you dig to the roots of flat earth, it’s a “don’t trust the secret globalist government feeding you lies” kind of thing (Aka a dog whistle for antisemitism)
Leftists are famous for infighting and disunity.
That’s a list of a bunch of trucks compared to a midsized SUV, so you’re kind of proving yourself wrong. Cars are split into weight classes, so a comparison that doesn’t acknowledge that isn’t very useful. A EV Sedan is on average much heavier than an ICE sedan.
No one’s saying ICE vehicles are better for the environment than EVs
You’re getting down voted but you’re right. I don’t think people realize that most tires are now made from synthetic rubber, AKA plastic.
Also someone tried to disprove you by posting a list with ICE trucks being as heavy as EV cars. Like what? Of course trucks are heavier. EV Trucks are even heavier than that and an EV subcompact will be much heavier than an ICE compact. Also everyone is talking about how trucks and SUVs are getting heavier and bigger. So not sure what they mean by “we never talk about this with trucks!”
I mean most things can, it just isn’t profitable…
TBH the same could be said for some areas of Boston…
Well yeah, you flattened the most complex problem of human history into a glib statement. When you remove nuance, you can make anything sound however you want.
Love how we went from “AI needs to be controlled so it doesn’t turn everything into paperclips” to “QUICK, WE NEED TO TURN THE PLANET INTO PAPERCLIPS TO GET THIS AI TO WORK!!”
Finding new and exciting ways to make cars more dangerous. What an inovator.
There’s a theory that part of the problem is that social media aggregates too many different people in one place. Our brains naturally create in groups and out groups, making conflict and toxicity inevitable.
I’m making a prediction right now that real self driving will eventually rely on people from impoverished countries remotely operating the cars of wealthier countries. Sort of like how AI training data is combed through.
And all this occurred within a church. Where are the charges against the church?
Oh, haha, first time witnessing religion complicit in criminal activity, huh?
Fixed, thanks.
This is not the result of a prolonged investigation. It’s the result of shifting precedent from a neoliberal, Chicago School, interpretation to a more “new deal” era interpretation of monopoly laws. For the last 30 years, monopolies could only be broken up if the corporation bought other companies "with the intention of of forming a “monopoly.” We literally had to get rid of all the followers of the Chicago School from the government and replace them with people that aren’t as friendly to corporations.
Basically, think of companies forming monopolies as drunk driving. If a court of law were to determine drunk driving manslaughter cases like they’ve been determining monopoly cases, you’d have to prove that the drunk driver left his house with the intention of killing someone inna drunk driving accident. So they’d always be able to say, “well I didn’t leave the house thinking I’d kill someone!” And get away of it. That’s how companies and the judicial system have been treating monopoly laws.
And a fueled bottle can keep billionaires in check.