From a different post for this link: “Wow, this is so sad. I didn’t know there was a Wonder Man thing in production either.”

Sounds like it’s working

I mean if I put my hand over my left then right side of my chest, it’s pretty clear which side my heart is on

Well I guess the obvious one to me is feeling a heartbeat. It seems like that would come up even outside of the medical field (schools, “playing doctor”, heck doing the pledge of allegiance if you’re in the US)

I’ve heard people talk about mirrored organs, is that something that would be immediately obvious? Like surely every person that has the condition would know about it.

While I think most agree with you, it’s important to note there is more to networking than WAN access. Streaming 4k in your home network over WiFi sounds pretty awesome for security cameras and other self-hosted medias.

If my only measure of worth was someone’s job and the circumstances they acquired it, I would say that it is entirely irresponsible to make any fair judgement.

Ah, I did not pick up on this being a resin printer. Thanks for the info, I’m not too aware on the tech behind resin

Not the OP, but what do you mean by this? I feel there’s an implication that it should be laid out a different way?

My issue with the demands to have apple allow iMessage on other platforms is that then we could get stuck with the expectation of catering to those users.

There already are encrypted messengers like signal, telegram, or even WhatsApp. Why aren’t people pushing at Apple users to make that switch themselves

You’re not wrong. I am most certainly projecting how I believe I might behave given the situation. And I do agree with the idea that once you give something, it’s not up to you to decide how it’s used. Like the article is pointing out, these biases are frighteningly common that funds will be used in negative ways (drugs/alcohol).

I am, however, trying to paint a more “accurate” picture for how most people would be charitably giving/receiving (small denominations, namely). Would that change in amount be significant in how it is then utilized.

The choice of it being given in a large sum is interesting. I recognize I have the bias of giving money to individuals with fear that it will be misused, but I do think it has to do with amount. If someone gave me $20 randomly, I’d be much more likely to impulse spend it than if I was given $1,000. With a large sum it feels more impactful to save/invest/pay bills than needing to contribute small amounts consistently.