I do think they have a point: there’s not many other engines I can think of that are quite as ‘tangible’ as theirs. Every object has its physical place in the world and can be picked up, manipulated,… in a way that’s unlike other engines where the world just feels more static.

I dab too, there are dozens of us!

That honestly seems pretty low for friend.com

Although the fact they’re developing hardware on less than a million dollar budget is bananas, let alone the other whack ideas

He’d probably do something similar on day 1 while at the same time starting to recuperate the action politically, and after a few days just go into full conspiracy or similar mode

I remember seeing a hypothesis that ADHD would have been beneficial in Hunter-gathering, as you would more quickly move from plant to plant rather than fully depleting a resource. It was just one study where they had a sort of game/simulation to test it though, so very early days on that theory.

Unpopular opinion because it’s so recent, but I think Starfield is/will be in this category

The problem with the Turing test and current AI is that we didn’t teach computers to think, we taught them to talk.

Which makes water lava, technically speaking

Yeah, the network wizard helped me with a dhcp problem with zero hassle, so that one’s definitely useful

I’m not sure it’s going to be that easy to pirate your way out of this. The amount of content is so vast it’s nearly impossible to host in a free way. I’m happy to pay for YouTube premium to support the creators, as well as paying for Nebula and Dropout for content, though neither can entirely replace YouTube’s vast amount of content and interface.

And to add a platitude: “Any idiot can build a bridge that stands, but it takes an engineer to build a bridge that barely stands.”

Wouldn’t it be Divinity 7?