• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 20th, 2023

help-circle
  • “Unfortunately, without access to one of their contracts, we can’t know for sure what power the broader group of creators actually has. It’s possible that the terms are so favorable for creators that their shadow equity is as good as actual ownership. It’s equally possible, however, that the system was set up in order to keep any meaningful power away from the creators.”

    I guess this kind of mixes up some concepts when we ask is nebula really creator owned.

    1. How does the equity get shared upon a liquidation.
    2. Can a creator cash in their shadow equity without liquidation.
    3. Do creators have ‘the potential’ for governance input.

    I see some positive in the fact that they offer ownership of the top holding company to big creators as an option. The most invested have the full protection. I can see reasons for having a two tierd system with phantom stocks, mostly in making adding new content creators easy.

    But I guess the question really is, is nebula willing to share standard terms of their creator contract?









  • mranachi@aussie.zonetoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlWhats your such opinion
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I don’t know what or if there are any cannon explanations, but I always had understood force as well… force. Bludgeoning, piercing, slashing are damage amplifiers that make do with limited force. But if you trying to damage say, a rock, they are basically irrelevant. But you put a rock in a hydrolic press and apply a enough force, and boom it cannot withstand. So being hit by an eldritch blast is less like being shot and more like being hit with a high pressure oil leak.