If that person made it through the probation period under your supervision, that’s still your fault. And if that person was there from the beginning, a senior in your team could still support them by teaching them good practices, showing them better options, etc. Or, as a last resort you could always assign them tasks that are more within their capabilities.
Micromanagement will never lead to people improving - quite the opposite in fact, they’ll start to care less because there’s always someone who prevents them doing mistakes.
And there are certain people where you have to micromanage them, because otherwise they’re just go to git commit absolute fucking shit, and it’s better to cut that off earlier via micromanagement, then allow it to pollute the repo.
Way to make sure they’ll never improve. We have merge requests and four eye policy for this, no need for micromanagement. There’s never a need for micromanagement, and if you feel like there is, your processes suck, which is your responsibility as a tech lead.
Informs you about stuff proactively and you don’t have to pull everything out of them yourself
Much of Marxist literature is still taught in universities because it’s in fact been such a good analysis of our economic system that it’s still relevant to this day
I am employed as a Software Engineer in the real estate sector. I’m also a commie. Many ultracapitalist assholes are using my software and they have no idea about my political views. I’m sure there are a lot more of us than one would normally think. It’s just that most of us are tired of having the same discussions with the same arguments over and over and over and over again, so we just don’t out ourselves 99% of the time :)