TechNom (nobody)

Gitlab is very complex and a heavy resource hog. You probably don’t need it. Most small to medium enterprises can comfortably host their projects on lightweight forgejo or gitea (speaking from experience). They even have functionality similar to github actions. If you need anything more complex, you are better off integrating another self hosted external service to the mix.

Oh man! I hate CF! The scummy gatekeepers.

He didn’t just wash off his hands. When asked in an interview about a moderator who edited a trans user’s profile to intentionally misgendering them (yup, even that’s not off limits for their mods), he justified it saying that ‘It’s not like using the N-word or something’. (For context, the n-word itself was innocuous. It gained notoriety due to its misuse by bigots like this).

There are several such examples - repeatedly even after being called out. I don’t belong to any diversity groups. But I don’t care if they make the world’s best operating system. I will stay well away from it if only to avoid any interaction with such a group. They’re a bit too happy about harassing people (not just transgenders either).

This is clearly intended as an alternative to submodules.

An alternative, not a replacement. Vdm is specifically designed to track code dependencies. There are use cases like monorepos where vdm won’t work.

Neither does Git though. I’m not really sure I follow your point.

Git does track submodule history unlike vdm.

By default, vdm sync also removes the local .git directories for each git remote, so as to not upset your local Git tree.

Git submodules don’t delete those .git directories. It uses them.

If you want to change the version/revision of a remote, just update your spec file and run vdm sync again.

This is not how git submodules or subtrees work.

vdm does depends on git being installed if you specify any git remote types

Support more than just git and file types, and make file better

Git submodules and subtrees don’t support anything other than git remotes.

Yes. I saw that. I was giving you my assessment based on the rest of the technical details in that readme. It doesn’t look like vdm is dealing with any part of the dependency repos (.git directories) other than to download them. In fact, they even mention deleting those .git directories. Please let me know if you think I misinterpreted any of those details.

Arch guide expanded in scope IMO. The choices are way more than in the past. However, it’s good quality and easy to read. I implore you to skim it, even if you don’t try it out.

Nvidia is a mess on Linux in general, though it’s gradually improving. They decided to neglect everything that the other GPU manufacturers and the community were doing and roll out their own buggy concepts.

This really isn’t the fault of Mint. PopOS works with it just because its developers System76 also has a line of nvidia based hardware. However, as I said before, nvidia is slowly starting to implement the standards and situation on other distros like Mint will gradually improve.

Meanwhile, I’m curious. What hardware did you try Mint on?

It didn’t look like a submodule reimplementation to me. Subtree is more of a submodule reimplementation. This is more like a language-agnostic package manager (like cargo, npm, etc) that downloads and caches source packages.

I wonder what happened to Tails - the one that started it all.

I do recommend Gentoo (haven’t tried Funtoo) for the academically inclined. It’s a beast to maintain, but you’ll soon find yourself at ease with configuring and compiling your own kernel, configuring your packages and even making some yourself.

It isn’t as hard as people make it out to be - if you gradually push your boundaries. In particular, it’s good if you already use Arch.

In that case, it’s time for the average workers to sabotage the bossware. Let the leech class solve the problem they create.

I thought IBM was still stuck with Watson. Have they moved on?

The licenses alone are enough to ensure that the opposite happens.

The problem is that all of those interdependent parts and software that are dependent on it become entrenched. There is no freedom to replace individual parts with an alternative because something else will break. That’s what I call ‘Modular in theory, monolithic in practice’.

For anyone looking to learn git, the official book and site are thorough and exceptional. You can even download the eBook for free. While there’s no harm in using other sources to learn git, don’t use them as an alternative to the canonical source.

That was only a very rough version. His original plan was to use it as a backend for other VCS. Torvalds handed over the maintainership of the project to Junio Hamano after about 4 months. Much of what we know today as git are contributions from him and others.

None of this is to say that Torvalds didn’t invent it. He invented the content addressed object storage format. But it’s important to understand the actual history of git’s evolution.

The story behind git is very dramatic. You should read it.

The hack is still not fully understood and is being analyzed. It doesn’t help that Github suspended everything, including the original maintainer’s account (who is believed to be a victim of social engineering).

Anyway, you will eventually see a post mortem. I’m willing to bet that it’s going to be as phenomenal as the hack itself. The case and its investigation is going to be a classic case study for all security researchers and security-minded users. Anyway, I doubt that the attackers will ever be found. Jia Tan, Jigar Kumar and others are going to remain as ghosts like Satoshi Nakamoto.

They really ought to have version masking like in Gentoo portage.

Unsafe code, at least in Rust, is given special treatment and care. Such code is usually 5% or less of the total codebase. Such unsafe blocks are also commonly reused fundamental designs. This leads to them being designed as libraries that are shared.

You can of course give C++ the same consideration. But then 100% of that code base will have to be given special care. And the reusability of unsafe code goes out the window.

People who argue that Rust (not sure about GC languages) is equivalent to C and C++ because of escape hatches like unsafe, completely neglect the localization of unsafe code and the benefits it brings.