You can criticise rust for a lot of things but bad learning materials I don’t think can be one of them. The sheer amount of high quality learning materials is one of the selling points for the language. It was one of the areas targeted strongly to get an easy on-ramp to drive adoption.

I haven’t looked for this kind of resource before but I found one that looks very high quality and up to date in less than a minute. https://github.com/nrc/r4cppp

This whole thing is incredibly immature and seems to be blown up to an absurd degree.

Did ThePHD unfairly have their hopes raised about giving a keynote speech? Sure. Was this done out of malice? After - for some reason - thousands of words of aired dirty laundry I can’t see any indication it was. I can’t see how hyper-analyzing everyone’s testimonies and expecting people to have a perfect memory of things they never thought they would have to post-hoc justify helps anyone. Is it really reasonable to expect people that get into highly technical positions based on technical merit to also be perfect organisers and have flawless interpersonal skills?

If there was some catalog of people being offered keynotes or other prestigious things and having them taken away due to spite I could see this being worth spending time over but as a one-off this all just seems absurd. Unless of course there was some key detail I’ve missed in the half-dozen blogs posts that makes everyone involved terrible people?

Neat, a way of ensuring zero panics in at least your own code is really cool. I wonder how deep the lint goes.

Dynamic libs in rust are supported but only through a c abi and it’s a bit complicated.

Looking at av1an I couldn’t see anything showing it is dynamicly loading anything, it looks to statically link to ffmpeg according to the build instructions.