• jkmooney@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    246
    arrow-down
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know, this person has done a lot of decent things in his life. I’m not inclined to judge him by his worst decision.

    • Backspacecentury@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      147
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I would tend to agree, if I’m reading this correctly, they sent the letters for the sentencing… meaning he was already convicted of rape and they were pleading for leniency for an old rapist buddy, like within the last few months. That is a really bad look no matter how you slice it.

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        219
        arrow-down
        55
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He’s also an old friend.

        I don’t believe in guilt by association. Asking for leniency for an old friend to a judge, and he didn’t get it, doesn’t make them monsters or rapists by proxy.

        If our culture demands every felon be shunned by their friends and family members going forward, then end the perverse charade and just kill everyone upon a felony conviction.

        Masterson did a very bad thing, some friends wrote letters to inform the judge that that isn’t all he is and to consider that, not out of malice, but out of compassion.

        Man, the internet has absolutely destroyed the concept of nuance. Then again, we only see our “justice,” lol, system as a way to turn the screws on bad people… that our society made, btw. Wanton spectator cruelty without the guilt. Not even a hint of attempts at rehabilitation, and just about everyone roots for a parolee’s failure to confirm their biases.

        Advocating maximum cruelty be inflicted on a perpetrator shouldn’t be confused with compassion for the victim. Americans largely ignore that distinction, because it’s convenient, easy, and pleasurable to revel in cruelty and call it kindness.

        • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          92
          arrow-down
          38
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or… we could accept that Masterson RAPED people, and maybe don’t give him any support, regardless of his past actions. We don’t need to hold out a hand for the fallen rapist. There are too many people in the world that genuinely need help that wasting even an iota of effort on a rapist is a slap in the face to them, not to mention the people the rapist has harmed. There is no nuance.

          • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            69
            arrow-down
            44
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Thank you for making my point.

            Masterson did RAPE people. Now, do we want to punish him and rehabilitate him, or get our vengeance boner on and beat on him because that hilariously makes our society feel virtuous?

            So much for society demonstrating being better than than those that violate its laws. Blood! Blood! More blood! Give us bloooood!

            • lingh0e@lemmy.film
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              64
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Don’t be glib. If it came out that my oldest friend wqs not only a rapist, but also used his fame and religion to silence the victims and avoid prosecution… AND I was involved with an organization with the express purpose of stopping sex abuse… I’d absolutely tell that friend to pound sand.

              There were multiple times when I learned that friends of mine were sexually assaulted, some of those times were by people I considered friends. There’s zero chance that I’d do anything to “put in a good word” for the rapists I once called friends, because their actions in my company have ZERO baring on how they acted in private.

              Tl;Dr: If you’re vouching for the upstanding nature of a convicted rapist based on your interactions when he wasn’t being a duplicitous rapist… that says more about your ignorance to how terrible that person can be as opposed to the good works you saw from the rapist when they weren’t raping. You’re also a victim.

              • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                28
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Masterson demonstrated no mercy in raping his victims.

                Our society demonstrating no mercy to those our society failed, and we did at some point for most felons if not Masterson, just makes us another link in the chain of cruelty. Mercy should always be considered, at every step, especially if we as a society espouse to be better than those we prosecute.

                Justice isn’t for pleasure, vengeance is. If you’re feeling good about anyone’s suffering, Masterson or his victims, that isn’t a sense of justice you’re feeling.

                  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    14
                    arrow-down
                    19
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    No, its compassionate, whether you agree its deserved or not.

                    Once again, a harsher punishment for the victimizer doesn’t equate to more compassion for the victim.

                    You can’t demonstrate compassion through cruelty. Reasonable punishment is justice, getting off on maximizing punishment is vengeance. Getting angry at a friend of the victimizer asking the judge to consider LESS THAN THE MAXIMUMUM CONCEIVABLE PUNISHMENT is literally getting mad at calls for mercy because it might have diminished your desire for maximum vengeance.

                • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  28
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This is some I’m 16 and this is deep bullshit. The point is we have a process in place to convict and sentence people charged with crimes. Once he was found guilty do his friends need to abandon him? No. But do they need to actually have him show a change BEFORE they show “leniency”. Yes. Your whole argument is so dumb it borders if not crosses over into making you a rape apologist.

                  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    16
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    No, this is some “we need to be better than those we convict, and that means always considering mercy as those we punish failed to” bullshit.

                    You’re right though. Deep fry em all in Crisco, balls first, all slow like, and make their parents watch! Woooooo justice!

                • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  those our society failed

                  Are you trying to tell me that Society failed Danny Masterson? Do you proof read what you write? No. Society failed the women that he raped. Society fails the millions that will die of treatable disease this year. Society fails the single mother that has to work three jobs to support herself and her child. Society did not, I repeat, did not fail Danny Masterson. Society taught him that rape is bad. Danny decided to do it anyway. Danny failed society.

              • phillaholic@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                18
                ·
                1 year ago

                Was there physical evidence on these? I’d feel the same way, but what if you didn’t think they did it? Not say that’s what this is. I have no clue.

                • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There was a whole court case about it.

                  “I know nothing about this but I question the legitimacy of the court’s decision” is a bizarre take.

                  • phillaholic@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I did no such thing. I know nothing about the case other than the accusation being strong enough that he was dropped from the Ranch and didn’t appear in that 90s Show. If there was physical evidence I don’t know how someone could think he didn’t do it and write these letters, even if they have been friends for 25 years. Only if there weren’t physical evidence could I fathom someone close to him like that believing that maybe he didn’t do it.

                  • phillaholic@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Wtf is up with Lemmy and people taking the time to reply to a comment without just answering a yes or no question? Is it the clientele? It’s like a damn Gentoo Linux forum where people put more effort ridiculing people than answering questions.

                    If they didn’t think he did it I could see writing these letters. If they think he did, I cannot fathom writing them. Does that make it clearer?

            • meco03211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              37
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Except this isn’t about Masterson. This is about Kutcher’s support for him. If I have a friend that turns out to be a rapist, that’s not a friend. That’s someone hiding an important, deal breaking secret. If you’ve hidden that from me, I’m not going to tell a judge you’re an otherwise good person that shouldn’t be punished accordingly. If I kept that person as a friend after their rapist nature is revealed, that speaks very poorly on my judgement.

              • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                18
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If you really don’t believe that these are people that did something wrong, that they should be shunned for the rest of their days by every living being, where’s the virtue in even keeping a felon alive? Why don’t we just have a door to a firepit in every jury courtroom that opens upon a guilty Verdict? Why pretend to weigh punishment with mercy, but still set them up for failure in every possible way?

                Honest question, do we want to be a benevolent society that sees a fallen member, and wants to help them reintegrate after their just punishment, or is mercy as a positive thing in our society as stone dead a concept as greed being a negative thing?

            • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not saying that we need to flog the guilty. I’m just saying that we don’t need to offer him more help than anyone else would get. Is Kutcher writing letters to every judge involved in a rape case and asking for them to go easy because the perp was a youth pastor? Justice is supposed to be blind. If celebrities, politicians, etc. get special treatment then we aren’t working to fix society, we are letting people in power run around doing whatever the fuck they want. Masterson should receive all the help the justice system affords a rapist, but not one bit more, and definitely not because he has celebrity friends writing letters on his behalf.

            • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              For just about any other crime I’d tend to agree with the sentiment, but for nearly any other crime I can come up with some hypothetical scenario where that crime is justifiable, where I can comprehend the reasoning behind the act.

              I can’t come up with any hypothetical where rape or sexual assault is justifiable.

              • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s never justifiable, agreed, but I disagree that it cannot be understood or that the victimizer deserves special worse punishment or consideration. Before we tested for people on the spectrum, people that legitimately lacked the capacity of impulse control were executed like anyone else. Now courts bicker about how low functioning you have to be for such things.

                Some people are born very low functioning and never get diagnosed, or throttle that line, and weren’t raised well, etc. Americans in general often refuse to see such nuance in such cases. They prefer to imagine a fair black and white world where every rapist is some evil mastermind when often they aren’t in control of themselves any of the time. It’s not like our mental healthcare system is robust enough to identify and mitigate those issues for poor kids who need it.

                I’m sure there are regular and high functioning rapists, like Weinstein and statutory rapists, but I rarely see a differentiation between those calculated actors and some barely sapient person with sporatic impulse control who really doesn’t have the capacity to empathize with their victim or consider the consequences, but squeaked by on the mental competence review. Those are worlds apart imho and should be treated as such.

                • mypuzzleaddiction@geddit.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Im just boggled at the mind at how concerned you are for the mechanics of rapists and how there’s something that makes them rape people and don’t seem to be at all concerned with the effects they have on those they raped.

                  I see this whole devils advocate thing and like whatever this is internet share your peace, but I just can’t understand how lacking empathy for the people you hurt in any way should lessen the consequences of the impact you cause. Context does not excuse consequences. I’m sure Masterson is sick in the head, you’d have to be to rape someone as maliciously, viciously, and violently as he did. I just hope you’re also out here advocating for more support to the victims who are now also sick from the trauma that was directly caused by this man’s actions.

                  Sure, let someone who according to you can’t control themselves back on the street and give him a lighter sentence. I’m sure he won’t go out and rape again since his lack of control apparently stops once he’s caught and convicted. We should just wait to see if he does it again and say “ooops, his bad let’s try another 5 years” to his next victim and send her off with hopefully a good ass therapist for the rest of her life since that’s how long the rape is going to affect her.

                  You talk about society lacking nuance but your nuance seems to extend only to the rapist and his buddies. They were not advocating for him to be rehabilitated. They were asking for him to get less time since “his daughter not having a father” would be an injustice. Sure, he’s been convicted of rape, but the injustice of the law here would be his daughter visiting him in jail where he’s not raping people. Now if Kutcher was like “he’s clearly sick, I hope you find an alternative to prison that helps rehabilitate him so he won’t harm others” I could see your point. That’s not what he said. That’s not what he was asking for. People are angry because it’s enraging to see celebrities and rich people get special treatment. Use each other’s fame to hurt others and escape consequences. Your worry about a lack of nunca is funnily enough so black and white in its arguments, you could say it in and of itself lacks nuance to how complicated the subject and ramifications of rape on a person actually are.

              • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You’re the most honest and/or self-aware one of the “string em up” crowd here. Thank you.

                You acknowledge where your stance comes from. I respect that, sincerely.

                • Daisyifyoudo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I think through introspection, education, and rehabilitation most criminals can work toward enlightenment and betterment. But sex offenders commit the most heinous of all crimes and deserve no extra consideration. They are blemishes in human evolution and are plagues on decency and humanity. At the absolute very best, they should be locked away from the rest of us

        • Cheems@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, so I get that asking for leniency for an old buddy sure. However… the specific crimes he committed and the organization that Ashton works for/runs whatever. That’s a bad fucking look. That’s a real bad fucking look. Like, that undermines a lot of shit he’s done look.

        • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Nobody is saying it makes them monsters or rapists by proxy, it just makes them friends of a rapist who stayed his friend even after it was proven that he raped at least two people, and then asked for him to be treated leniently even though he certainly didn’t grant any leniency to the people he raped. And they’re free to do that. But disapproving of that isn’t guilt by association, that’s just them making choices regarding their relationship with a rapist that other people are free to judge and criticize them for.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not like he just stole a car or something. Rapists deserve the worst punishments we have to offer.

      • zaph@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        meaning he was already convicted of rape

        The letters are typically asked for before conviction as a just-in-case. He’s still asking for leniency for his rapist buddy I just thought I’d clarify that little bit.

      • habanhero@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        In other words, whether Ashton Kutcher is actually guilty of anything does not matter, because a “bad look” is like a virus, and conviction enough for people to feel justified in upending his life / work. So proud of this brave new neo-puritanical world we live in today. /s

        What’s the new, hip term for witch-hunt in 2023?

        • Ozymati@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re right, this kind of thing is nothing new. We’ve always been a society which will turn on a dime on anyone, no matter how good or poor the excuse, if given a good pretext to do so. It seems to be human nature.

          • habanhero@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Never give up a free chance to step on another human being to make oneself feel taller. Give them a few kicks while they are down for good measures. All made extra easy by the internet and cancel culture!

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      1 year ago

      Although I tend to agree, I think this was also the correct decision. He would have distracted from the good work the organisation does.

      • Anus B. Samus @feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        While the organization might do good work, I see far too many red flags in their demands. They are lobbying against end-to-end encryption for chat messages. The argument is that child abusers can hide behind encryption. While this is true, a ban would lead to no privacy for everyone.

        The real-life equivalent would be mandatory microphones for everyone so authorities could catch child molesters more easily. Good cause but horrible methodology. And of course, if they succeed, criminals will move to other, maybe their own-built, messaging systems that still have encryption.

        https://www.thorn.org/blog/encryption-trend-threatens-child-safety-gains/

    • Windshear@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Get out of here with your reason. That’s not what the internet is for. Now, would you like a torch or pitchfork?

    • QHC@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s fair to judge someone directly involved with covering up a rapist when that person is also very vocal and actively involved in combating exactly that crime. That’s a pretty massive lapse in judgement and more indicative of his true character than someone that had a single instance of road rage or similar emotional outburst.

      • habanhero@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        directly involved with covering up a rapist

        This is a pretty serious accusation. Just because he wrote a character letter does not mean he is actively involved in covering up a crime, that’s a gigantic leap.

        his true character

        And what would that be? A person who vouches for his friend? Someone who misjudged another person’s character, a mistake presumably you’d never make?

        I think it’s fair to judge

        No, you think it’s fun to judge and it’s your excuse to feel morally righteous and superior. You’ve made some accusations and backhanded disparagement based on what info? How is any part of it “fair”?

        • QHC@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Writing a letter with the intent of reducing the sentence of a convicted rapist counts as a coverup in my book.

          Also, individuals who continue to defend rapists are not good people. Doesn’t matter if they are friends.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        The judge misspelled “Actual Rapist Allen Turner, formerly known as Brock Turner”

        Tell your friends! He’s going by his middle name now

    • xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      His worst decision was very relevant to the organization he was part of. I get that they are friends but he probably should be in a good position to understand how unlikely it is that his friend was innocent and how dumb it would be to put himself on the line defending him given what that organization stands for.

    • steakmeout@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      OK, now think of this from the perspective of the victims of Danny Masterson’s crimes - what do you think they feel about Ashton’s letter of support?

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That we can say Kutcher was wrong for supporting Masterson while also acknowledging that Kutcher has done good things. People aren’t good or bad, they are a mixture. Condemn the bad traits and praise the good traits.

    • jkmooney@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea, I get it, some will disagree but, in the end, I’m a bigger fan of “call out culture” than “cancel culture”. The former gives the person a chance to course-correct.

      • habanhero@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        But “cancel culture” makes keyboard warriors and the Twitterverse feel saintly, holier-than-thou and powerful because it takes just a few tweets to mess people up! And look righteous while doing it!

        Maybe they are valuable members of society after all! /s

        • BurtReynoldsMustache@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You gonna pin the tail on cancel culture and “The Twitterverse” for criminals like Jeffrey Epstein being outed too? Lmao you’re a joke. Masterson RAPED WOMEN, many more of them than the mere handful that were included in the case, i promise you. And his friends went out of their way to use their influence and names to sway a judge in his favor. That’s fucked up, and anyone who says differently is blatantly in support of rapists, rape apologists, or is undoubtedly one themselves trying to justify monstrous behavior.

          • habanhero@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not talking about Masterson, Epstein and their crimes - I’m talking about Kutcher, who has done more to help anti-child trafficking than all you keyboard warriors put together. Guilt by association is not a thing, despite how much you get off on it and want to wish it into reality.

            anyone who says differently is blatantly in support of rapists, rape apologists, or is undoubtedly one themselves trying to justify monstrous behavior.

            Witch hunt 101, anyone? You’re so excited to judge, sentence and exert perverse power over another person’s life, you don’t even realize you are doing the exact same thing as history’s witch hunt instigators, under the guise of a modern, rebranded religion.

      • jkmooney@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course not. You know that, I know that, everyone reading this knows that, you are just being a troll. Stop, or get blocked.

    • grimace1153@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, it doesnt matter how much good you’ve done. People love witch hunts. Whether this is his worst decision or not, it’s one decision, now the rest are erased.

      He’s done good and would continue to, but people are happier if he is never heard from again rather than him helping kids for the rest of his life.