• @yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      98 months ago

      set their development timeline back by at least 3 years or more.

      This is based on the assumption that they’ll finish the game before releasing it.

    • Dark ArcA
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      To be fair, in this case there is increased value because eventually the engine work requirements will be significantly reduced.

      This isn’t rewrite everything, it’s basically remove a bunch of stuff and rewrite the rest.

      • Hypx
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        Given how massive their game is, I’m doubtful. So much of what they did in the first game will have to be rebuilt. Compared to just reusing most of the original assets and code, this sounds like a lot more work.

        • Dark ArcA
          link
          English
          18 months ago

          Maybe, it might also be easier to reuse portions of the engine in Unreal Engine while using parts of Unreal (like its rendering engine) than you think though. Assets largely I’d expect to be portable or at least comvertable with a custom asset loader.

          I’m talking a little out of my ass though, and neither of us is familiar with the code. Point being though, it’s a little different moving engines than rewriting a complicated web server (a project I have been a part of and would not recommend).