ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoMeta to pay Texas $1.4 billion for using facial recognition technology without users’ permission.www.texastribune.orgexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1278arrow-down13cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1275arrow-down1external-linkMeta to pay Texas $1.4 billion for using facial recognition technology without users’ permission.www.texastribune.orgModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up43arrow-down1·4 months agoThis is one of the best cases of “When one of the worst cunts you know of makes a really good point.”
minus-squaresolsangraal@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down1·4 months agoi’d wager it’s more about paxton trying to let zuckerberg know who’s boss, and that he’d better toe the line if he wants to stay in business the notion that ken paxton actually cares about commoners’ privacy is, um…sus
minus-squareVanth@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·edit-23 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarebarsquid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 months agoThis sounds like an excellent law so it is shocking as fuck that it came out of Texas.
/static.texastribune.org/media/files/92e525dfa5fa30ca5b37b9d58650156c/Meta%20REUTERS%20TT.jpg)
This is one of the best cases of “When one of the worst cunts you know of makes a really good point.”
i’d wager it’s more about paxton trying to let zuckerberg know who’s boss, and that he’d better toe the line if he wants to stay in business
the notion that ken paxton actually cares about commoners’ privacy is, um…sus
deleted by creator
This sounds like an excellent law so it is shocking as fuck that it came out of Texas.