The Court upheld many restrictions on the White House and Surgeon General’s office’s contacts with tech companies, finding that they ‘coerced’ platforms’ content decisions

WP gift article expires in 14 days.

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/E0sEO

  • Dark ArcA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    A foreign actor’s speach isn’t constitutionally protected; that’s the relevance.

    • MasterBuilder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Free speech does not include subversion of the constitutional right to vote or seditious speech. The judges are clearly partisans. I’ll wager they are Republican appointees.

        • MasterBuilder@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lying about voting locations and dates aren’t subverting the constitution? Really? So we only have the constitutional right to vote if we can figure out the real times and locations on our own, and giving false information that causes people to be unable to Vote is all just lulz?