• filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    4 months ago

    Pretty much what NVIDIA is doing with their GPUs. Refusing to provide adequate future proof amount of VRAM on their cards. That’s planned obsolescence in action.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      And like Apple, Nvidia has no shortage of fanboys that insist the pitiful amounts of (V)RAM is enough. The marketing sway those two companies have is incredible.

      It’s a complete joke that Sapphire had an 8GB version of the R9 290X, what, 11 years ago or something? And yet Nvidia is still selling 8GB cards now, for exorbitant prices, and people lap it up.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        The current GPU situation actually has me curious about AMDs upcoming Halo APU chips. They’re likely going to be pretty expensive relative to their potential GPU equivelent performance but if they work out similar to the combined price of a CPU and GPU then it might be worthwhile as they use onboard RAM as their VRAM. Probably a crazy idea but one I look forward to theory-building in spring when they release.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        This happens if you sell your hardware as DRM key to use their software (i(Pad)OS, macOS etc. and Cuda)