I sort of want to see what these things are like but I don’t want to give them any data or contribute to them in any way haha. I’ve heard the Queen of Canada uses it which intrigues me

    • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Probably because there is tons of known criminal activity, most chats are not encrypted, the CEO was just arrested, etc.

      OP is probably interested in seeing the chaos of the platform without necessarily being part of it. I imagine that’s somehow seeing the illicit activity going on.

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’m interested in the political stuff particularly, I don’t really know or hang around any of the people who seem to use it and it would be interesting to be able to see that unfolding.

        You always hear about reports of Twitter threads or Telegram communities in the news (like the Queen of Canada) but I sometimes want to actually see things firsthand so I can understand how these people interact. Its like watching a nature documentary almost

        • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I totally sympathize with that. As a privacy-conscious person I block the majority of social media domains since they’re used for tracking.

          It’s now annoying seeing news articles that embed tweets that I can no longer see, but I shrug it off as part of the cost of privacy. It would be convenient to see the content without necessarily being tracked.

      • tomi000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Its one of the few ways to communicate without major privacy issues, so of course it attracts criminal activity in some way. The insane part is that it somehow became normal for governments to spy on their citizens to an extent where the CEO of a communications platform is being arrested for not spying on their users.

        • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh I know. I was just exploring why someone might call it “insane.” I installed it long ago but quickly uninstalled it when I realized how insecure it is.

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why is Telegram “insane”?

      Because you get people who think other people’s opinions are “programmed”, or that those people are “brainwashed”.

      Telegram serves useful purposes. Unfortunately, it can also be a breeding ground for the tin foil hat folks.

    • demesisx@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      OP’s programming mandates it.

      Edit: the next step is to accuse anyone who disagrees with that characterization of being a “Russian” or “Chinese” bot or even a “tankie” if I say anything that wouldn’t belong in Bob Dole’s campaign platform from 40 years ago. It’s so pervasive among lemmy.world users that “programming” is the only word I know of that captures how brainwashed into fighting this tribalist “culture war” they actually are.

      • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s like far-left rhetoric (especially the kind that seems to come from people who have never seen how e.g. spoilers work or who have never had to find a compromise) isn’t actually that popular, so you see pushback from the instance that dominates the user population, especially with it having users who aren’t “ideologically aligned” with a specific instance and who may have a perspective outside the bubble. I don’t know, just a theory.