• roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Even the US uses white phosphorus against infantry in violation of international law. I can’t imagine what we’d resort to with Russian soliders on our soil.

      • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh man…Geneva convention would be out the window and most land based invaders at that point would probably beg to be shipped back. And it’s not because of the military in America. It’s because of its inhabitants. When the banjos start tuning in the Appalachian forests you know Hell is a safer space than anywhere you’re going to reach.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        WP isn’t illegal. It’s illegal to torch down civilian structures, with Willy Pete or any other technology. But it’s always been fair game to use incendiaries against combatants. War is hell.

      • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lol Russian soldiers on US soil? The US military would do good to hang back, avert their gaze, and let the US citizens handle things how they see fit. Plausible deniability and all that

        • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          This fucking waffle maker in my comments above yours keeps trying to convince me that America hasnt “experienced” war. And that war is horrible, as if America isn’t the most successful War tribe in all of recorded history.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            If successful means achieving none of your strategic objectives, but wasting trillions killing a whole bunch of civilians, sure.

            • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Yea that.

              But like also WW1, WW2 on two separate fronts…at the same time, Korean war, Kosovo.

              Honerable mentions: Greek civil war, Afghanistan Russian war, Arabian Israel wars.

              Oh right…lol. the American civil war, and the American revolution, the war of 1812, the Spanish American war…

              Well shit Skippy …weve been in some conflicts. How many aircraft carriers does your country have floating around?

              • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Korea

                The Korean War included the greatest retreat in US history, which was only stopped because we were fighting an enemy with barely any industrial capacity to resupply troops, or even supply them with enough radios, and we failed to achieve the objective of a unified Korea (letalone the bloodthirsty moron MacArthur’s objective of invading China and becoming the “ceasar of the east”).

                Kosovo, Yugoslavia

                We bombed a bunch of civilians, showed the world that our B2 stealth bomber could be shot down by 30 year old, man-portable AA. I’m still unsure what strategic use bombing embassies and apartments was.

                Greek civil war, Afghanistan Russian war, Arabian Israel wars

                America didn’t didn’t directly fight any of those.

                the war of 1812

                We lost that one, our objective was to take Spanish America, and we failed that. They also burned the whitehouse.

                WWI, WWII, Spanish American war

                Those the US did manage to achieve some of it’s objectives, but WWII was 80 years ago.

                American civil war, and the American revolution

                Those were primarily against other Americans.

                • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Yea the honerable mentions we’re just assists. War of 1812 was a war I wanted to mention as one we fought. American civil war is a war America objectively won. And the American revolution America objectively won.