• Eximius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    A better way to word it is: SMR is only suited for archival usage. Large writes, little-to-no random writes.

      • Eximius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        If you know the format of SMR, then you can trivially see the read performance is not impacted. Writing is impacted, because it has to write multiple times for each sector write (because of overlapping sectors that allow the extra density).

        Impacted write performance, coupled with hdds are generally slow with random writes PLUS the extra potential for data loss due to less-atomic sector writes, makes them terrible drives for everything except archival usage.