Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company suspended shipments to China-based chip designer Sophgo after a chip it made was found on a Huawei AI processor, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Sophgo had ordered chips from TSMC that matched the one found on Huawei’s Ascend 910B, the people said. Huawei is restricted from buying the technology to protect U.S. national security. Reuters could not determine how the chip ended up on the Huawei product.

Tech research firm TechInsights discovered the TSMC chip on Huawei’s Ascend 910B when it took apart the multi-chip processor, a different source told Reuters on Tuesday. Alerted to the finding, about two weeks ago TSMC notified the U.S., the source said.

  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You don’t seem to understand what I’m saying.

    I’d be surprised to find a Cortex M0 in an SoC that billed itself as having a Cortex M33, for example.

    A System on a Chip can often have a CPU, GPU, and other subprocessors all on one die, but multiple chips on a processor is backwards.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      So… you’re saying calling a productized die a “chip” is inappropriate? I think you’d be in the minority.

        • Bezier@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That is not very friendly.

          Anyway, here’s a picture of what I believe is a multi-chip processor.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s something else entirely. It literally even says “chiplet” at the top. It is a collection of discrete processor chips.

              • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                2 months ago

                I know that SIP isn’t anything new, but it’s still not what “processor” brings to mind. It’s a package or a module, and it could comprise one or more processors.

                • Bezier@suppo.fi
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  So the pedantry is that the whole package can’t be called a processor. A CPU is not a processor.

            • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Seems my other, completely reasonable retort was removed 🙄

              So all I’ll say is: based on you seemingly not understanding what a chip is, it seriously brings into disrepute your claim that you are a professional in the semiconductor industry.