• BertramDitore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The only legitimate use I can think of for AI in podcasting might be for realtime translations so people who don’t speak the language of the podcaster can still listen. Even that makes me feel weird, but I think it could be done ethically-ish. Same deal for voice-cloning, I think that would be super-useful for realtime translations, so listeners still kinda hear the host’s voice, even translated. But every other use I can think of is ripe for abuse and won’t result in quality content.

    • a_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Some YouTube creators are doing this right now. AI generated translations with the creator’s voice. Looking at it from simply a nerds’s perspective, it’s fucking neato

  • mPony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Spotify’s plans to take money from subscribers but never pay a fucking dime to anyone else , ever.

  • Tarogar@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Right. AI music? Hopefully not, it is likely going to lead to generic slop that may infringe on other artists copyright. AI Podcasts? OH GOD NO! factual news isn’t working with AI and you guys think that opinions with AI is a good idea? Are you crazy?

    Now music recommendations? That might just work given that algorithms are already doing a decent job at presenting new ( to the particular user, not by actual age) music that the user may enjoy. The question really is if that is actually better than what we already have. And there is only one way to find out, which is by testing it and then being honest about it.

    • Joker@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Move to piracy and donate to the artists directly to better support the artist, if that is an option.

      Tidal still take a cut from the artists revenue.

      • quirzle@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’ll pitch Bandcamp as an option, especially if/when they bring back Bandcamp Fridays next year (where they don’t take a cut on specific days). Not everyone’s on it, but it’s generally a reasonable, legal option for those artists that are.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Fuck Jack Dorsey too though, and its lacking a few bells ad whistles last time I checked.

    • essteeyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      You’d cancel rather than just not listening to that content?

      Edit: I’m just asking a question, wow.

      • Virkkunen@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I never listen to podcasts and yet Spotify shoves them in my face every time I open the app. Spotify also constantly resets my quality preferences back to auto (which is just low quality with another name). Every time I want to shuffle a playlist, Spotify sneaks in songs they think I might like as the first shuffle option. So I do believe they’ll be forcing this AI slop front and center everywhere and it won’t be as simple as not listening to it.

      • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I cancelled Spotify when they started pushing podcasts in my music app, with no way to turn it off.

        Why pay for a service that actively pushes you towards stuff you don’t want? Especially if there’s alternatives that cost the same and … don’t do that.

      • Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Well, there’s a few aspects of it. If they push it, it could make my experience worse (This tends to happen with any service that’s pushing AI). I also consider it to be highly unethical, so it lowers my opinion of their ethics (not that it’s high to begin with) and makes me more likely to protest them on ethical grounds. After all, I’m here now instead of Reddit for similar reasons.

    • mPony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      yes but if Spotify uses its own GenAI music, they don’t have to pay anyone else when someone listens to it.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    The closest I want to AI music is ENUNUNU or Diffsinger, which still require a human(s) to actually put in effort for a good quality song.

    But they don’t care because there’s less profit in letting humans be creative.